HB2: The effects of polarizing legislation on recruitment practices
In response to a Charlotte, North Carolina, transgender nondiscrimination ordinance, state lawmakers drafted what is now famously known as House Bill 2. Charlotte's ordinance required businesses and other public facilities to allow transgender individuals to use the bathroom of their choice, an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Recruiting & retaining adult learners 2017-05, Vol.19 (8), p.6-7 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 6 |
| container_title | Recruiting & retaining adult learners |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Parks, Rodney Parrish, Jesse |
| description | In response to a Charlotte, North Carolina, transgender nondiscrimination ordinance, state lawmakers drafted what is now famously known as House Bill 2. Charlotte's ordinance required businesses and other public facilities to allow transgender individuals to use the bathroom of their choice, and House Bill 2 effectively overturned it by prohibiting local governments from imposing inclusion‐oriented requirements on businesses. The bill also mandates that in public buildings, transgender individuals must use the bathroom that corresponds to the sex on their birth certificate, even if it contradicts their identity expression or how they present themselves. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nsr.30245 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nsr_30245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>NSR30245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c745-a3dbc6f637e5b7973bb226b4a22a967a08777a76ec3891478abdc398a35023b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j01LxDAQhoMouKx78B_k6qG7aT5bb1rUFRYF7cFbSLKTNdJtS1KR9ddbrXhzGJg5PO8LD0LnOVnmhNBVm-KSEcrFEZrRXIhMclEc__385RQtUnoj43AhBWUzVK2v6SWuXwGD9-CGhDuP-64xMXyGdocb2IXUmCF0LR43govvYdhDO-A-GjcEB-kMnXjTJFj83jmqb2_qap1tHu_uq6tN5hQXmWFb66SXTIGwqlTMWkql5YZSU0plSKGUMkqCY0WZc1UYu3WsLAwThDJL2RxdTLUudilF8LqPYW_iQedEf_vr0V__-I_samI_QgOH_0H98Pw0Jb4ActRb-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>HB2: The effects of polarizing legislation on recruitment practices</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Parks, Rodney ; Parrish, Jesse</creator><creatorcontrib>Parks, Rodney ; Parrish, Jesse</creatorcontrib><description>In response to a Charlotte, North Carolina, transgender nondiscrimination ordinance, state lawmakers drafted what is now famously known as House Bill 2. Charlotte's ordinance required businesses and other public facilities to allow transgender individuals to use the bathroom of their choice, and House Bill 2 effectively overturned it by prohibiting local governments from imposing inclusion‐oriented requirements on businesses. The bill also mandates that in public buildings, transgender individuals must use the bathroom that corresponds to the sex on their birth certificate, even if it contradicts their identity expression or how they present themselves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2155-644X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-6458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nsr.30245</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Recruiting & retaining adult learners, 2017-05, Vol.19 (8), p.6-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnsr.30245$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnsr.30245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parks, Rodney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Jesse</creatorcontrib><title>HB2: The effects of polarizing legislation on recruitment practices</title><title>Recruiting & retaining adult learners</title><description>In response to a Charlotte, North Carolina, transgender nondiscrimination ordinance, state lawmakers drafted what is now famously known as House Bill 2. Charlotte's ordinance required businesses and other public facilities to allow transgender individuals to use the bathroom of their choice, and House Bill 2 effectively overturned it by prohibiting local governments from imposing inclusion‐oriented requirements on businesses. The bill also mandates that in public buildings, transgender individuals must use the bathroom that corresponds to the sex on their birth certificate, even if it contradicts their identity expression or how they present themselves.</description><issn>2155-644X</issn><issn>2155-6458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j01LxDAQhoMouKx78B_k6qG7aT5bb1rUFRYF7cFbSLKTNdJtS1KR9ddbrXhzGJg5PO8LD0LnOVnmhNBVm-KSEcrFEZrRXIhMclEc__385RQtUnoj43AhBWUzVK2v6SWuXwGD9-CGhDuP-64xMXyGdocb2IXUmCF0LR43govvYdhDO-A-GjcEB-kMnXjTJFj83jmqb2_qap1tHu_uq6tN5hQXmWFb66SXTIGwqlTMWkql5YZSU0plSKGUMkqCY0WZc1UYu3WsLAwThDJL2RxdTLUudilF8LqPYW_iQedEf_vr0V__-I_samI_QgOH_0H98Pw0Jb4ActRb-A</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Parks, Rodney</creator><creator>Parrish, Jesse</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>HB2: The effects of polarizing legislation on recruitment practices</title><author>Parks, Rodney ; Parrish, Jesse</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c745-a3dbc6f637e5b7973bb226b4a22a967a08777a76ec3891478abdc398a35023b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parks, Rodney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Jesse</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Recruiting & retaining adult learners</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parks, Rodney</au><au>Parrish, Jesse</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HB2: The effects of polarizing legislation on recruitment practices</atitle><jtitle>Recruiting & retaining adult learners</jtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>6-7</pages><issn>2155-644X</issn><eissn>2155-6458</eissn><abstract>In response to a Charlotte, North Carolina, transgender nondiscrimination ordinance, state lawmakers drafted what is now famously known as House Bill 2. Charlotte's ordinance required businesses and other public facilities to allow transgender individuals to use the bathroom of their choice, and House Bill 2 effectively overturned it by prohibiting local governments from imposing inclusion‐oriented requirements on businesses. The bill also mandates that in public buildings, transgender individuals must use the bathroom that corresponds to the sex on their birth certificate, even if it contradicts their identity expression or how they present themselves.</abstract><doi>10.1002/nsr.30245</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2155-644X |
| ispartof | Recruiting & retaining adult learners, 2017-05, Vol.19 (8), p.6-7 |
| issn | 2155-644X 2155-6458 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nsr_30245 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Education Source |
| title | HB2: The effects of polarizing legislation on recruitment practices |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T07%3A59%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HB2:%20The%20effects%20of%20polarizing%20legislation%20on%20recruitment%20practices&rft.jtitle=Recruiting%20&%20retaining%20adult%20learners&rft.au=Parks,%20Rodney&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=6-7&rft.issn=2155-644X&rft.eissn=2155-6458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nsr.30245&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ENSR30245%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |