Accelerating 3D-T 1ρ mapping of cartilage using compressed sensing with different sparse and low rank models
To evaluate the feasibility of using compressed sensing (CS) to accelerate 3D-T mapping of cartilage and to reduce total scan times without degrading the estimation of T relaxation times. Fully sampled 3D-T datasets were retrospectively undersampled by factors 2-10. CS reconstruction using 12 differ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2018-10, Vol.80 (4), p.1475-1491 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To evaluate the feasibility of using compressed sensing (CS) to accelerate 3D-T
mapping of cartilage and to reduce total scan times without degrading the estimation of T
relaxation times.
Fully sampled 3D-T
datasets were retrospectively undersampled by factors 2-10. CS reconstruction using 12 different sparsifying transforms were compared, including finite differences, temporal and spatial wavelets, learned transforms using principal component analysis (PCA) and K-means singular value decomposition (K-SVD), explicit exponential models, low rank and low rank plus sparse models. Spatial filtering prior to T
parameter estimation was also tested. Synthetic phantom (n = 6) and in vivo human knee cartilage datasets (n = 7) were included.
Most CS methods performed satisfactorily for an acceleration factor (AF) of 2, with relative T
error lower than 4.5%. Some sparsifying transforms, such as spatiotemporal finite difference (STFD), exponential dictionaries (EXP) and low rank combined with spatial finite difference (L+S SFD) significantly improved this performance, reaching average relative T
error below 6.5% on T
relaxation times with AF up to 10, when spatial filtering was used before T
fitting, at the expense of smoothing the T
maps. The STFD achieved 5.1% error at AF = 10 with spatial filtering prior to T
fitting.
Accelerating 3D-T
mapping of cartilage with CS is feasible up to AF of 10 when using STFD, EXP or L+S SFD regularizers. These three best CS methods performed satisfactorily on synthetic phantom and in vivo knee cartilage for AFs up to 10, with T
error of 6.5%. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mrm.27138 |