Automatic Recognition of Laryngoscopic Images Using a Deep‐Learning Technique
Objectives/Hypothesis To develop a deep‐learning–based computer‐aided diagnosis system for distinguishing laryngeal neoplasms (benign, precancerous lesions, and cancer) and improve the clinician‐based accuracy of diagnostic assessments of laryngoscopy findings. Study Design Retrospective study. Meth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 2020-11, Vol.130 (11), p.E686-E693 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives/Hypothesis
To develop a deep‐learning–based computer‐aided diagnosis system for distinguishing laryngeal neoplasms (benign, precancerous lesions, and cancer) and improve the clinician‐based accuracy of diagnostic assessments of laryngoscopy findings.
Study Design
Retrospective study.
Methods
A total of 24,667 laryngoscopy images (normal, vocal nodule, polyps, leukoplakia and malignancy) were collected to develop and test a convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based classifier. A comparison between the proposed CNN‐based classifier and the clinical visual assessments (CVAs) by 12 otolaryngologists was conducted.
Results
In the independent testing dataset, an overall accuracy of 96.24% was achieved; for leukoplakia, benign, malignancy, normal, and vocal nodule, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.8% vs. 98.9%, 97% vs. 99.7%, 89% vs. 99.3%, 99.0% vs. 99.4%, and 97.2% vs. 99.1%, respectively. Furthermore, when compared with CVAs on the randomly selected test dataset, the CNN‐based classifier outperformed physicians for most laryngeal conditions, with striking improvements in the ability to distinguish nodules (98% vs. 45%, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
DOI: | 10.1002/lary.28539 |