Plant growth, leaf photosynthesis, and nutrient-use efficiency of citrus rootstocks decrease with phosphite supply

Some formulations of phosphite (Phi) have been recommended as a source of P nutrition for several crops including citrus even though there are known negative effects of Phi on plant growth. Changes in plant growth and metabolism after Phi application should be reflected in altered nutrient‐use effic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plant nutrition and soil science 2011-06, Vol.174 (3), p.487-495
Hauptverfasser: César Bachiega Zambrosi, Fernando, Mattos Jr, Dirceu, Syvertsen, James P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Some formulations of phosphite (Phi) have been recommended as a source of P nutrition for several crops including citrus even though there are known negative effects of Phi on plant growth. Changes in plant growth and metabolism after Phi application should be reflected in altered nutrient‐use efficiency and leaf photosynthesis. We carried out a greenhouse study using seedlings of two contrasting citrus (Citrus spp.) rootstocks, Carrizo citrange (CC) and Smooth Flat Seville (SFS), growing in either aerated hydroponic culture or sterilized native sandy soil. Plants were subjected to four P treatments: No P (control, P0); 0.5 mM Pi (PO4‐P); 0.25 mM Pi + 0.25 mM Phi (Pi + Phi), or 0.5 mM Phi (Phi). Photosynthetic characteristics, concentrations of total P (Pt) and soluble PO4‐P or PO3‐P in leaves and roots, and plant growth were evaluated after 80–83 d P treatments. Overall, the Pi plants had the highest Pt (total P) and total plant dry weight while the P0 plants had the lowest Pt but highest total root length and root‐to‐shoot ratio. Leaf chlorophyll (SPAD readings) and net assimilation of CO2 (ACO2) of the P0 and Phi plants were similarly lower than those of Pi and Pi + Phi plants. Growth responses of the Pi + Phi treatment were intermediate between the Pi and Phi treatments. Although Phi increased Pt and soluble‐PO4‐P concentration in leaves and roots above the P0 treatment, this did not translate into increased plant growth. In fact, the Phi treatment had some phytotoxic symptoms, impaired P‐ and N‐utilization efficiency for biomass production as well as lower nutrient‐use efficiency in the photosynthetic process. Thus, these two rootstocks could not use Phi as a nutritional source of P.
ISSN:1436-8730
1522-2624
DOI:10.1002/jpln.201000320