Automated segmentation of the healed anterior cruciate ligament from T 2 relaxometry MRI scans

Collagen organization of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be evaluated using T * relaxometry. However, T * mapping requires manual image segmentation, which is a time-consuming process and prone to inter- and intra- segmenter variability. Automating segmentation would address these challenge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic research 2023-03, Vol.41 (3), p.649-656
Hauptverfasser: Flannery, Sean W, Barnes, Dominique A, Costa, Meggin Q, Menghini, Danilo, Kiapour, Ata M, Walsh, Edward G, Bear Trial Team, Kramer, Dennis E, Murray, Martha M, Fleming, Braden C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Collagen organization of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be evaluated using T * relaxometry. However, T * mapping requires manual image segmentation, which is a time-consuming process and prone to inter- and intra- segmenter variability. Automating segmentation would address these challenges. A model previously trained using Constructive Interference in Steady State (CISS) scans was applied to T * segmentation via transfer learning. It was hypothesized that there would be no significant differences in the model's segmentation performance between T * and CISS, structural measures versus ground truth manual segmentation, and reliability versus independent and retest manual segmentation. Transfer learning was conducted using 54 T * scans of the ACL. Segmentation performance was assessed with Dice coefficient, precision, and sensitivity, and structurally with T * value, volume, subvolume proportions, and cross-sectional area. Model performance relative to independent manual segmentation and repeated segmentation by the ground truth segmenter (retest) were evaluated on a random subset. Segmentation performance was analyzed with Mann-Whitney U tests, structural measures with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and performance relative to manual segmentation with repeated-measures analysis of variance/Tukey tests (α = 0.05). T * segmentation performance was not significantly different from CISS on all measures (p > 0.35). No significant differences were detected in structural measures (p > 0.50). Automatic segmentation performed as well as the retest on all segmentation measures, whereas independent segmentations were lower than retest and/or automatic segmentation (p 
ISSN:0736-0266
1554-527X
DOI:10.1002/jor.25390