The limitations of mono‐ and combination antibiotic therapies on immature biofilms in a murine model of implant‐associated osteomyelitis
Treatment of implant‐associated orthopedic infections remains challenging, partly because antimicrobial treatment is ineffective after a mature biofilm covers the implant surface. Currently, the relative efficacy of systemic mono‐ and combination standard‐of‐care (SOC) antibiotic therapies over the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic research 2021-02, Vol.39 (2), p.449-457 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Treatment of implant‐associated orthopedic infections remains challenging, partly because antimicrobial treatment is ineffective after a mature biofilm covers the implant surface. Currently, the relative efficacy of systemic mono‐ and combination standard‐of‐care (SOC) antibiotic therapies over the course of mature biofilm formation is unknown. Thus, we assessed the effects of cefazoline (CEZ), gentamicin (GM), and vancomycin, with or without rifampin (RFP), on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation during the establishment of implant‐associated osteomyelitis in a murine tibia model. Quantitative scanning electron microscopy of the implants harvested on Days 0, 3, and 7 revealed that all treatments except CEZ monotherapy significantly reduced biofilm formation when antibiotics started at Day 0 (0.46‐ to 0.25‐fold; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0736-0266 1554-527X |
DOI: | 10.1002/jor.24956 |