The Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale: Turkish Validation and Relationship to Academic Major

One common self‐assessment of creativity is the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K‐DOCS). This article provides support for a Turkish translation of the instrument, offering exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to determine whether the factors were consistent across cultures. The partici...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of creative behavior 2020-12, Vol.54 (4), p.1002-1012
Hauptverfasser: Kandemir, Mehmet Ali, Kaufman, James C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:One common self‐assessment of creativity is the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K‐DOCS). This article provides support for a Turkish translation of the instrument, offering exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to determine whether the factors were consistent across cultures. The participants consisted of two groups. The first group consisted of 1,260 undergraduate students (912 females, 348 males) at a public university in Turkey and was utilized for the principal axis factoring analysis. Horn's parallel analysis, a robust statistical technique, was employed to determine the number of factors to be extracted from a scale. The second group consisted of 1,215 participants (885 females and 330 males) who were utilized for confirmatory factor analysis. Results supported a nine‐factor solution as a better fit for this sample than the five‐solution originally used by Kaufman. Of the original five factors, four factors were divided into two sub‐factors, which were distinct although moderately correlated. Finally, we determined the relationship between K‐DOCS factors and college major. We also found good evidence for the construct, discriminant, and convergent validity of the scale. Relationships between K‐DOCS factors and college major were largely consistent with predictions, providing additional evidence for the construct validity of the scale.
ISSN:0022-0175
2162-6057
DOI:10.1002/jocb.428