Improved p K a prediction: Combining empirical and semimicroscopic methods

Using three different methods we tried to compute 171 experimentally known p K a values of ionizable residues from 15 different proteins and compared the accuracies of computed p K a values in terms of the root mean square deviation (RMSD) from experiment. One method is based on a continuum electros...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computational chemistry 2008-11, Vol.29 (15), p.2575-2581
Hauptverfasser: Kieseritzky, Gernot, Knapp, E. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Using three different methods we tried to compute 171 experimentally known p K a values of ionizable residues from 15 different proteins and compared the accuracies of computed p K a values in terms of the root mean square deviation (RMSD) from experiment. One method is based on a continuum electrostatic model of the protein including conformational flexibility (KBPLUS). The others are empirical approaches with PROPKA deploying physically motivated energy terms with adjustable parameters and PKAcal using an empirical function with no physical basis. PROPKA reproduced the p K a values with highest overall accuracy. Differentiating the data set into weakly and strongly shifted experimental p K a values, however, we found that PROPKA's accuracy is better if the p K a values are weakly shifted but on equal footing with that of KBPLUS for more strongly shifted values. On the other hand, PKAcal reproduces strongly shifted p K a values badly but weakly shifted values with the same accuracy as PROPKA. We tested different consensus approaches combining data from all three methods to find a general procedure for most accurate p K a predictions. In most of the cases we found that the consensus approach reproduced experimental data with better accuracy than any of the individual methods alone. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2008
ISSN:0192-8651
1096-987X
DOI:10.1002/jcc.20999