Clinical pharmacy initiative to increase naloxone prescribing in patients with opioid use disorder
Introduction The national opioid epidemic has garnered the attention of various health agencies. A leading strategy in mitigating risk from the opioid public health crisis, including opioid use disorder (OUD), is via increased promotion and access to the lifesaving opioid antagonist, naloxone. Pharm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAACP : Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy 2022-02, Vol.5 (2), p.174-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
The national opioid epidemic has garnered the attention of various health agencies. A leading strategy in mitigating risk from the opioid public health crisis, including opioid use disorder (OUD), is via increased promotion and access to the lifesaving opioid antagonist, naloxone. Pharmacists have been recognized as integral in addressing this emergency; however, literature evaluating outcomes from multifaceted clinical pharmacy specialist (CPS) interventions and involvement is lacking. The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to evaluate the impact of a CPS initiative to increase naloxone prescribing proportions (number of patients with OUD with an active prescription for naloxone within the past year divided by the number of patients with OUD), patient access to care, and clinical interventions.
Methods
Pain management CPSs, mental health CPSs, and clinical pharmacy leadership within a Veterans Health System spearheaded a variety of interventions to increase naloxone prescribing in patients with OUD including focused education with prescribers, naloxone informational letters, review of population management tools identifying patients with OUD indicated to receive naloxone, CPS naloxone prescribing, and automated naloxone drug orders integrated into electronic health record progress note templates. The preintervention and postintervention evaluation periods were three‐month time frames. Naloxone prescribing proportions were compared before and after implementation of these interventions. Additional outcomes evaluated were number of encounters, number of patients seen/reviewed, and number of clinical interventions completed by the CPSs.
Results
There was a significant increase observed in naloxone prescribing proportions from 34.1% to 57.5% postintervention (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2574-9870 2574-9870 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jac5.1568 |