Human‐centered Smart Cities: An evaluation of a small community using the Smart Cities Initiative framework

In September 2023, the INCOSE Smart Cities Initiative released a framework to evaluate and define smart city systems. The framework includes a human‐centered definition of a smart city and offers metrics of a smart city. The definition, metrics, and framework are based on a systematic process that a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:INCOSE International Symposium 2024-07, Vol.34 (1), p.1211-1226
Hauptverfasser: CSEP, Jennifer L. Russell, EISE, Dugar, Jargalsaikhan, III, Joseph W. Sweeney
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1226
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1211
container_title INCOSE International Symposium
container_volume 34
creator CSEP, Jennifer L. Russell, EISE
Dugar, Jargalsaikhan
III, Joseph W. Sweeney
description In September 2023, the INCOSE Smart Cities Initiative released a framework to evaluate and define smart city systems. The framework includes a human‐centered definition of a smart city and offers metrics of a smart city. The definition, metrics, and framework are based on a systematic process that allows consistent evaluation of city that focuses on providing for fundamental human needs. Many smart city applications still focus on technology, regardless of whether that technology provides a clear benefit to the stakeholders of the city. Systems engineering tools and practices offer potential for improving smart city implementations by improving the alignment of needs and solutions. Unfortunately, in new domains, such as the plethora domains involved with smart cities, systems engineering can be viewed as unnecessary overhead. Therefore, the usefulness of the systems engineering concepts that underlie the INCOSE Smart Cities framework could be overlooked unless it can provide immediate value. As a demonstration of how the new framework could be used by someone interested in engaging INCOSE Smart Cities concepts, a high‐level application of the definitions and framework was performed. The analysis demonstrated that a simple review of the city system, using the perspectives of the INCOSE Smart Cities initiative, could reveal strengths and weaknesses of a smart city and identify potential next steps for improvement. This paper is a case study of how to use qualitative analysis to apply the human‐centered definition and framework to evaluate a Smart City. The case study provides an opportunity to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the new INCOSE framework.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/iis2.13205
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_iis2_13205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>IIS213205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-b2d6fa3af088a9ddae81979be38b643ca519cba2b590959141a416fa85edeb303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsNRefII9C6n7J5tkvZWiNlDw0N7DJJnoajaR3aQlNx_BZ-yTmFoPevE0P5jvG4YfIdeczTlj4tYYL-ZcCqbOyERIGQYqkfH5r3xJZt6_MsZ4GEeRZBNiV72F5vDxWWDTocOSbiy4ji5NZ9Df0UVDcQd1D51pG9pWFKi3UNe0aK3tG9MNtPemeabdC_5RaTouzajtkFYOLO5b93ZFLiqoPc5-5pRsH-63y1WwfnpMl4t1UMSxCnJRRhVIqFiSgC5LwITrWOcokzwKZQGK6yIHkSvNtNI85BDy0UgUlphLJqfk5nS2cK33Dqvs3ZnxtyHjLDtWlR2ryr6rGmF-gvemxuEfMkvTjTg5X8Lpbeo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human‐centered Smart Cities: An evaluation of a small community using the Smart Cities Initiative framework</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>CSEP, Jennifer L. Russell, EISE ; Dugar, Jargalsaikhan ; III, Joseph W. Sweeney</creator><creatorcontrib>CSEP, Jennifer L. Russell, EISE ; Dugar, Jargalsaikhan ; III, Joseph W. Sweeney</creatorcontrib><description>In September 2023, the INCOSE Smart Cities Initiative released a framework to evaluate and define smart city systems. The framework includes a human‐centered definition of a smart city and offers metrics of a smart city. The definition, metrics, and framework are based on a systematic process that allows consistent evaluation of city that focuses on providing for fundamental human needs. Many smart city applications still focus on technology, regardless of whether that technology provides a clear benefit to the stakeholders of the city. Systems engineering tools and practices offer potential for improving smart city implementations by improving the alignment of needs and solutions. Unfortunately, in new domains, such as the plethora domains involved with smart cities, systems engineering can be viewed as unnecessary overhead. Therefore, the usefulness of the systems engineering concepts that underlie the INCOSE Smart Cities framework could be overlooked unless it can provide immediate value. As a demonstration of how the new framework could be used by someone interested in engaging INCOSE Smart Cities concepts, a high‐level application of the definitions and framework was performed. The analysis demonstrated that a simple review of the city system, using the perspectives of the INCOSE Smart Cities initiative, could reveal strengths and weaknesses of a smart city and identify potential next steps for improvement. This paper is a case study of how to use qualitative analysis to apply the human‐centered definition and framework to evaluate a Smart City. The case study provides an opportunity to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the new INCOSE framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2334-5837</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2334-5837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/iis2.13205</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>INCOSE International Symposium, 2024-07, Vol.34 (1), p.1211-1226</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 by Jennifer L. Russell, Jargalsaikhan Dugar, and Joseph W. Sweeney III. Permission granted to INCOSE to publish and use.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fiis2.13205$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fiis2.13205$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CSEP, Jennifer L. Russell, EISE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugar, Jargalsaikhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>III, Joseph W. Sweeney</creatorcontrib><title>Human‐centered Smart Cities: An evaluation of a small community using the Smart Cities Initiative framework</title><title>INCOSE International Symposium</title><description>In September 2023, the INCOSE Smart Cities Initiative released a framework to evaluate and define smart city systems. The framework includes a human‐centered definition of a smart city and offers metrics of a smart city. The definition, metrics, and framework are based on a systematic process that allows consistent evaluation of city that focuses on providing for fundamental human needs. Many smart city applications still focus on technology, regardless of whether that technology provides a clear benefit to the stakeholders of the city. Systems engineering tools and practices offer potential for improving smart city implementations by improving the alignment of needs and solutions. Unfortunately, in new domains, such as the plethora domains involved with smart cities, systems engineering can be viewed as unnecessary overhead. Therefore, the usefulness of the systems engineering concepts that underlie the INCOSE Smart Cities framework could be overlooked unless it can provide immediate value. As a demonstration of how the new framework could be used by someone interested in engaging INCOSE Smart Cities concepts, a high‐level application of the definitions and framework was performed. The analysis demonstrated that a simple review of the city system, using the perspectives of the INCOSE Smart Cities initiative, could reveal strengths and weaknesses of a smart city and identify potential next steps for improvement. This paper is a case study of how to use qualitative analysis to apply the human‐centered definition and framework to evaluate a Smart City. The case study provides an opportunity to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the new INCOSE framework.</description><issn>2334-5837</issn><issn>2334-5837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsNRefII9C6n7J5tkvZWiNlDw0N7DJJnoajaR3aQlNx_BZ-yTmFoPevE0P5jvG4YfIdeczTlj4tYYL-ZcCqbOyERIGQYqkfH5r3xJZt6_MsZ4GEeRZBNiV72F5vDxWWDTocOSbiy4ji5NZ9Df0UVDcQd1D51pG9pWFKi3UNe0aK3tG9MNtPemeabdC_5RaTouzajtkFYOLO5b93ZFLiqoPc5-5pRsH-63y1WwfnpMl4t1UMSxCnJRRhVIqFiSgC5LwITrWOcokzwKZQGK6yIHkSvNtNI85BDy0UgUlphLJqfk5nS2cK33Dqvs3ZnxtyHjLDtWlR2ryr6rGmF-gvemxuEfMkvTjTg5X8Lpbeo</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>CSEP, Jennifer L. Russell, EISE</creator><creator>Dugar, Jargalsaikhan</creator><creator>III, Joseph W. Sweeney</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Human‐centered Smart Cities: An evaluation of a small community using the Smart Cities Initiative framework</title><author>CSEP, Jennifer L. Russell, EISE ; Dugar, Jargalsaikhan ; III, Joseph W. Sweeney</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-b2d6fa3af088a9ddae81979be38b643ca519cba2b590959141a416fa85edeb303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CSEP, Jennifer L. Russell, EISE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugar, Jargalsaikhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>III, Joseph W. Sweeney</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>INCOSE International Symposium</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CSEP, Jennifer L. Russell, EISE</au><au>Dugar, Jargalsaikhan</au><au>III, Joseph W. Sweeney</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human‐centered Smart Cities: An evaluation of a small community using the Smart Cities Initiative framework</atitle><jtitle>INCOSE International Symposium</jtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1211</spage><epage>1226</epage><pages>1211-1226</pages><issn>2334-5837</issn><eissn>2334-5837</eissn><abstract>In September 2023, the INCOSE Smart Cities Initiative released a framework to evaluate and define smart city systems. The framework includes a human‐centered definition of a smart city and offers metrics of a smart city. The definition, metrics, and framework are based on a systematic process that allows consistent evaluation of city that focuses on providing for fundamental human needs. Many smart city applications still focus on technology, regardless of whether that technology provides a clear benefit to the stakeholders of the city. Systems engineering tools and practices offer potential for improving smart city implementations by improving the alignment of needs and solutions. Unfortunately, in new domains, such as the plethora domains involved with smart cities, systems engineering can be viewed as unnecessary overhead. Therefore, the usefulness of the systems engineering concepts that underlie the INCOSE Smart Cities framework could be overlooked unless it can provide immediate value. As a demonstration of how the new framework could be used by someone interested in engaging INCOSE Smart Cities concepts, a high‐level application of the definitions and framework was performed. The analysis demonstrated that a simple review of the city system, using the perspectives of the INCOSE Smart Cities initiative, could reveal strengths and weaknesses of a smart city and identify potential next steps for improvement. This paper is a case study of how to use qualitative analysis to apply the human‐centered definition and framework to evaluate a Smart City. The case study provides an opportunity to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the new INCOSE framework.</abstract><doi>10.1002/iis2.13205</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2334-5837
ispartof INCOSE International Symposium, 2024-07, Vol.34 (1), p.1211-1226
issn 2334-5837
2334-5837
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_iis2_13205
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Human‐centered Smart Cities: An evaluation of a small community using the Smart Cities Initiative framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A17%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%E2%80%90centered%20Smart%20Cities:%20An%20evaluation%20of%20a%20small%20community%20using%20the%20Smart%20Cities%20Initiative%20framework&rft.jtitle=INCOSE%20International%20Symposium&rft.au=CSEP,%20Jennifer%20L.%20Russell,%20EISE&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1211&rft.epage=1226&rft.pages=1211-1226&rft.issn=2334-5837&rft.eissn=2334-5837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/iis2.13205&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EIIS213205%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true