Rainfall partitioning varies across a forest age chronosequence in the southern A ppalachian M ountains

Evaporation of precipitation from plant surfaces, or interception, is a major component of the global water budget. Interception has been measured and/or modelled across a wide variety of forest types; however, most studies have focused on mature, second‐growth forests, and few studies have examined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecohydrology 2019-06, Vol.12 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Brantley, Steven T., Miniat, Chelcy F., Bolstad, Paul V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Evaporation of precipitation from plant surfaces, or interception, is a major component of the global water budget. Interception has been measured and/or modelled across a wide variety of forest types; however, most studies have focused on mature, second‐growth forests, and few studies have examined interception processes across forest age classes. We present data on two components of interception, total canopy interception ( E i ) and litter interception—that is, O i  + O e horizon layers—( E ff ), across a forest age chronosequence, from 2 years since harvest to old growth. We used precipitation, throughfall, and stemflow collectors to measure total rainfall ( P ) and estimate E i ; and collected litter biomass and modelled litter wetting and drying to estimate evaporative loss from litter. Canopy E i , P minus throughfall, increased rapidly with forest age and then levelled off to a maximum of 21% of P in an old‐growth site. Stemflow also varied across stands, with the highest stemflow (~8% of P ) observed in a 12‐year‐old stand with high stem density. Modelled E ff was 4–6% of P and did not vary across sites. Total stand‐level interception losses ( E i  +  E ff ) were best predicted by stand age ( R 2  = 0.77) rather than structural parameters such as basal area ( R 2  = 0.49) or leaf area ( R 2  
ISSN:1936-0584
1936-0592
DOI:10.1002/eco.2081