Evidence that reversal of mouse aggression is not related to beta blockade

The ED50s for reversal of mouse aggression were determined for nine beta adrenergic receptor blockers: metoprolol, nadolol, pindolol, propranolol, acebutolol, penbutolol, labetalol, timolol, and atenolol. Propranolol and penbutolol generated linear doseresponse curves, suggesting easy access to brai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug development research 1988, Vol.13 (4), p.259-267
Hauptverfasser: DaVanzo, John P., McConnaughey, M. M., Brooks, Richard, Cooke, Lisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The ED50s for reversal of mouse aggression were determined for nine beta adrenergic receptor blockers: metoprolol, nadolol, pindolol, propranolol, acebutolol, penbutolol, labetalol, timolol, and atenolol. Propranolol and penbutolol generated linear doseresponse curves, suggesting easy access to brain. To determine if beta blockade was actually occurring at the receptor level, upregulation of beta receptors after 10 days of chronic treatment with the ED50s was determined in the limbic system as well as other areas of brain. These areas included: olfactory bulbs, hypothalamus, septum, amygdala, cortex, midbrain, cerebellum, pons, and medulla. Upregulation occurred in all areas of the brain in animals treated with propranolol and penbutolol, suggesting that at the dose required to block aggressing in fighting mice, beta receptors were also effectively blocked. With other drugs (timolol, atenolol, pindolol, metoprolol, nadolol, and acebutolol) the ED50s produced localized upregulation of beta receptors, but nothing consistent in the limbic areas. The beta blocker labetalol at the ED50 for reversal of mouse aggression produced virtually no upregulation of brain receptors, suggesting no correlation between antiaggression and beta blockade.
ISSN:0272-4391
1098-2299
DOI:10.1002/ddr.430130408