A fully spectral solution method for parabolic equations

A comparison is made between the performance of the (aliased) Chebȳshev collocation method (CM) and the more recent Galerkin collocation method (GCM), which is a least‐squares collocation method, in solving the laminar, incompressible, steady boundary‐layer equations, which are parabolic in nature....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communications in numerical methods in engineering 1995-09, Vol.11 (9), p.765-774
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, K. N. Kiran, Eswaran, V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A comparison is made between the performance of the (aliased) Chebȳshev collocation method (CM) and the more recent Galerkin collocation method (GCM), which is a least‐squares collocation method, in solving the laminar, incompressible, steady boundary‐layer equations, which are parabolic in nature. An iterative procedure based on the preconditioned residual minimization method has been used. It is shown that the GCM is superior to the CM on several counts. Unlike the CM, the GCM minimizes the residual uniformly over the entire domain. The global accuracy of the solution is found to be higher in the GCM, at lower grid resolutions. The method also achieves much higher convergence rates. Unlike in the collocation method, the final residual values obtained in the GCM are good indicators of the level of accuracy achieved in the solution. It is highly likely that these results will be repeatable in other systems of parabolic partial differential equations.
ISSN:1069-8299
1099-0887
DOI:10.1002/cnm.1640110907