Organic Super‐Acceptors with Efficient Intramolecular Charge‐Transfer Interactions by [2+2] Cycloadditions of TCNE, TCNQ, and F 4 ‐TCNQ to Donor‐Substituted Cyanoalkynes

Rivaling the best one : Thermal [2+2] cycloadditions of TCNE, TCNQ, and F 4 ‐TCNQ to N , N ‐dimethylanilino‐substituted cyanoalkynes afforded a new class of organic super‐acceptors featuring efficient intramolecular charge‐transfer interactions. These acceptors rival the acceptor F 4 ‐TCNQ in the propensity for reversible electron uptake as well as in electron affinity (see figure), which makes them interesting as p‐type dopants for potential application in optoelectronic devices. magnified image Thermal [2+2] cycloadditions of tetracyanoethene (TCNE), 7,7,8,8‐tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ), and 2,3,5,6‐tetrafluoro‐7,7,8,8‐tetracyanoquinodimethane (F 4 ‐TCNQ) to N , N ‐dimethylanilino‐substituted (DMA‐substituted) alkynes bearing either nitrile, dicyanovinyl (DCV; ‐CHC(CN) 2 ), or tricyanovinyl (TCV; ‐C(CN)C(CN) 2 ) functionalities, followed by retro‐electrocyclization, afforded a new class of stable organic super‐acceptors. Despite the nonplanarity of these acceptors, as revealed by X‐ray crystallographic analysis and theoretical calculations, efficient intramolecular charge‐transfer (CT) interactions between the DMA donors and the CN‐containing acceptor moieties are established. The corresponding CT bands appear strongly bathochromically shifted with maxima up to 1120 nm (1.11 eV) accompanied by an end‐absorption in the near infrared around 1600 nm (0.78 eV) for F 4 ‐TCNQ adducts. Electronic absorption spectra of selected acceptors were nicely reproduced by applying the spectroscopy oriented configuration interaction (SORCI) procedure. The electrochemical investigations of these acceptors by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and rotating disc voltammetry (RDV) in CH 2 Cl 2 identified their remarkable propensity for reversible electron uptake rivaling the benchmark compounds TCNQ ( E red,1 =−0.25 V in CH 2 Cl 2 vs. Fc + /Fc) and F 4 ‐TCNQ ( E red,1 =+0.16 V in CH 2 Cl 2 vs. Fc + /Fc). Furthermore, the electron‐accepting power of these new compounds expressed as adiabatic electron affinity (EA) has been estimated by theoretical calculations and compared to the reference acceptor F 4 ‐TCNQ, which is used as a p‐type dopant in the fabrication of organic light‐emitting diodes (OLEDs) and solar cells. A good linear correlation exists between the calculated EAs and the first reduction potentials E red,1 . Despite the substitution with strong DMA donors, the predicted EAs reach the value calculated for F 4 ‐TCNQ (4.96 eV) in many cases, which makes the new acceptors in