Molecular dynamics study of H 4 TTP crystal morphology

To understand the role of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on the crystal growth morphology of 2,3,5,6‐tetra(1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)pyrazine (H 4 TTP), the vacuum morphology of H 4 TTP crystal was predicted by the Bravais–Friedel–Donnay–Harker (BFDH) and the attachment energy (AE) models. The growth morphology o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society 2022-07, Vol.43 (7), p.978-983
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Jing, Li, Jun, Li, Yongxiang, Liu, Qiao'e, Zhang, Xuan, Ruan, Jian, Wang, Xiaojun, Liu, Wendong, Kim, Chan Kyung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To understand the role of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on the crystal growth morphology of 2,3,5,6‐tetra(1H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl)pyrazine (H 4 TTP), the vacuum morphology of H 4 TTP crystal was predicted by the Bravais–Friedel–Donnay–Harker (BFDH) and the attachment energy (AE) models. The growth morphology of H 4 TTP in DMSO solvent was predicted using a modified AE model. The results show that the main growth surfaces of H 4 TTP in vacuum are (1 0 0), (0 0 2), (0 1 1), and (1 1 0) surfaces. Among them, (1 0 0) surface is the most important growth surface. (0 0 2) surface is the roughest crystal surface, while (1 1 0) surface is the flattest. (1 1 0) surface grows rapidly, and (1 0 0) surface has the greatest morphological importance. The analysis of radial distribution function shows that (1 0 0) surface has the strongest hydrogen bonding interactions in the interface between H 4 TTP and DMSO solvent.
ISSN:1229-5949
1229-5949
DOI:10.1002/bkcs.12544