Bioequivalency of oral suspension formulations of cefixine

A study was performed in 24 healthy male subjects to establish that two suspension formulations of cefixime were bioequivalent to each other and to a reference oral solution. A single 400mg oral dose of the drug was given in a randomized three‐way crossover design as two suspensions (a research susp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition 1989-03, Vol.10 (2), p.205-211
Hauptverfasser: Faulkner, Robert D., Sia, Louisa L., Barone, Joseph S., Forbes, St. J., Silber, B. Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A study was performed in 24 healthy male subjects to establish that two suspension formulations of cefixime were bioequivalent to each other and to a reference oral solution. A single 400mg oral dose of the drug was given in a randomized three‐way crossover design as two suspensions (a research suspension (RS) used during clinical trials and a suspension intended for marketing (MS)) and a reference oral solution (SOL). Each dose was separated from the other by a 3‐day washout period. Mean peak serum concentrations (Cmax) were 4·67, 4·10, and 4·27 μg ml−1 after the MS, RS, and SOL, respectively. Although comparison (ANOVA) of the mean pharmacokinetic parameters for cefixime found significant differences (p < 0·05) in Cmax, the time to Cmax, and area under the serum concentration time curve (AUC 0∞) values among the three formulations, the mean differences were less than 20 per cent. No significant differences (p > 0·05) were found in either the elimination half‐life or renal clearance of unchanged drug. Overall, with a 98 per cent power to detect a 20 per cent difference in AUC0→∞ or urinary recovery values between the formulations tested, the results show that the MS was bioequivalent to the RS and that both suspensions were bioequivalent to the SOL.
ISSN:0142-2782
1099-081X
DOI:10.1002/bdd.2510100209