Flue gas conditioning by in situ oxidation of so 2 applying dielectric barrier discharge

An advanced flue gas conditioning technology was developed through in situ oxidation of SO 2 using dielectric barrier discharge and heterogeneous condensation of SO 3 on fly ash (FA). Orthogonal experiments were carried out for the design of discharge structure, whereas the optimal condition was ach...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asia-Pacific journal of chemical engineering 2013-09, Vol.8 (5), p.636-644
Hauptverfasser: Che, Yao, Wang, Zuwu, Zhou, Jiayong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An advanced flue gas conditioning technology was developed through in situ oxidation of SO 2 using dielectric barrier discharge and heterogeneous condensation of SO 3 on fly ash (FA). Orthogonal experiments were carried out for the design of discharge structure, whereas the optimal condition was achieved at 8 kV of discharge voltage, 2 mm of discharge gap and 56 cm 2 of discharge area; single factor experiment was introduced here to investigate impacts of various elements (gas flux, temperature, concentration of SO 2 and relative humidity) on oxidation of SO 2 , results showed that the oxidation of SO 2 was in inverse proportion to gas flux and SO 2 concentration, whereas in direct proportion to relative humidity, the optimal temperature was detected at 45 °C. Physical and chemical characterizations of treated samples were performed in this work using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR). Particle coagulation was found in the SEM, and a continuous peak rise of sulfate at 1086 cm −1 was detected by the FTIR analysis, which indicated that SO 3 generated by in situ oxidation of SO 2 could be successfully absorbed by the surface of FA particles. The specific resistance of conditioning FA showed a remarkable decrease from 1.41 × 10 13 to 5.74 × 10 11  Ω cm compared with the untreated sample. © 2012 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:1932-2135
1932-2143
DOI:10.1002/apj.1704