Sex / gender bias on the Face‐Name Associative Memory Exam in clinically‐normal older adults
Background Many studies of memory in older adults report a sex difference, usually with female participants scoring slightly better than males. These sex differences may be partially due to the content of the tests, with some content being more memorable to males or females (https://doi.org/10.1093/...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alzheimer's & dementia 2023-12, Vol.19 (S18), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Many studies of memory in older adults report a sex difference, usually with female participants scoring slightly better than males. These sex differences may be partially due to the content of the tests, with some content being more memorable to males or females (https://doi.org/10.1093/ARCLIN/ACAC102). We investigated whether male and female older adults show differences on the Face‐Name Associative Memory Exam (FNAME‐12, designed to detect subtle Alzheimer’s disease‐related memory impairment). Specifically, do they show a bias towards remembering the stimuli that match their own sex?
Method
Participants (n = 432, see Table 1) in ‘Insight 46’, a sub‐study of the MRC National Survey of Health and Development (British 1946 birth cohort), completed FNAME‐12 (version A) at age ∼73 years. Stimuli comprise six male and six female faces (presented in alternating order), with names and occupations. Recall is tested four times after various delay intervals. Four total scores were calculated across all recall trials: female names; female occupations; male names; male occupations. We fitted multivariable regression models using Generalised Estimating Equations to investigate effects of item type (name/occupation), item gender (male/female) and participant sex (male/female), and interactions between these variables, controlling for age, education, socioeconomic position and prospectively‐collected childhood cognitive ability.
Result
Women outperformed men (coefficient averaged across the four conditions = 2.2 points [95% CIs 1.3, 3.1], p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1552-5260 1552-5279 |
DOI: | 10.1002/alz.078524 |