DNA methylation profiling of individual neurons isolated from post‐mortem brain tissue using laser capture microdissection and adapted limiting dilution bisulfite pyrosequencing

Background A challenge frequently encountered in neuroepigenomic research, especially in the context of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, is the difficulty of measuring epigenetic patterns in heterogenous bulk tissue samples, as these are known to cause noise during profiling....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2023-12, Vol.19 (S12), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Riemens, Renzo J.M., Kenis, Gunter, Nolz, Jennifer, Chaves, Sonia C. Susano, Duroux, Diane, Pishva, Ehsan, Mastroeni, Diego, Van Steen, Kristel, Haaf, Thomas, Hove, Daniel L. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background A challenge frequently encountered in neuroepigenomic research, especially in the context of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, is the difficulty of measuring epigenetic patterns in heterogenous bulk tissue samples, as these are known to cause noise during profiling. A viable strategy to overcome this challenge is to analyze epigenetic marks in single neurons that have been isolated using laser capture microdissection (LCM). Method In this study, we developed a new approach for targeted DNA methylation profiling of individual genes that combines the use of LCM and limiting dilution bisulfite pyrosequencing (LDBSP). By utilizing this method, we were able to determine the cytosine‐phosphate‐guanine (CpG) methylation rates of single alleles obtained from 50 neurons, which were isolated from unfixed post‐mortem brain tissue. Result We demonstrate how the methylation status of multiple genes such as RHBDF2, OXT, TNXB, DNAJB13, PGLYRP1, C3, and LMX1B, can be quantified simultaneously using the method described above. In addition, we provide an adapted data analysis pipeline for LDBSP, which accounts for and corrects methylation rates obtained from multi‐allele reactions. Furthermore, we show that the efficiency of LDBSP on DNA derived from LCM‐isolated neurons is comparable to the efficiency in previous studies using other cell types. Conclusion This method allows for a more precise determination of the DNA methylation status of each targeted gene in the neuronal cell samples under investigation, thereby increasing the validity of the technique.
ISSN:1552-5260
1552-5279
DOI:10.1002/alz.074057