Microglia‐specific Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk score is associated with amyloid‐β, tau, and microglial activation

Background Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have implicated microglia in AD pathogenesis, and microglia is a promising cellular therapeutic target in AD. However, it remains unclear when and how AD genetic risk localizing to microglia contributes to AD pathophysiolo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2022-12, Vol.18 (S4), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Hyun‐Sik, Teng, Ling, Kang, Daniel, Menon, Vilas, Ge, Tian, Finucane, Hilary, Schultz, Aaron P., Properzi, Michael J, Klein, Hans‐Ulrich, Chibnik, Lori B., Schneider, Julie A, Bennett, David A, Hohman, Timothy J., Mayeux, Richard, Johnson, Keith A., De Jager, Philip L, Sperling, Reisa A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have implicated microglia in AD pathogenesis, and microglia is a promising cellular therapeutic target in AD. However, it remains unclear when and how AD genetic risk localizing to microglia contributes to AD pathophysiology. Method Participants are from two community‐based cohorts (Religious Orders Study, the Rush Memory and Aging Project [ROSMAP]; n = 299 deceased; age 88.9±7.1, female 67%) and the screening phase of an AD prevention trial (the Anti‐Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s study [A4]; n = 2919 cognitively unimpaired; age 71.4±4.8, female 60%). We quantified post‐mortem Aβ and tau in ROSMAP, and used PET to quantify Aβ (florbetapir cortical composite standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR]) and tau (flortaucipir temporal composite SUVR; subset n = 302) in A4. In a subset of ROSMAP participants (n = 31), we evaluated the proportion of activated microglia (PAM) in post‐mortem neocortex. We combined AD GWAS summary statistics with cellular gene expression profiles from human brain single nucleus sequencing, to derive cell‐type‐specific ADPRS (excluding APOE region) in ROSMAP and A4. We assessed the association of each (standardized) cell‐type‐specific ADPRS with AD pathology (linear regression; adjusting for APOE genotypes, age, sex, and first 10 genotype principal components), and examined the correlation between the microglial ADPRS and PAM (Pearson’s correlation). We used Bonferroni‐corrected p‐value threshold, p0.05). Microglial ADPRS showed a suggestive association with temporal composite tau (beta = 0.033, p = 0.012; Figure 1D), even after additionally adjusting for Aβ (beta = 0.024, p = 0.048). Microglial ADPRS was positively correlated with PAM in ROSMAP (Figure 2). Conclusion Genetic risk of AD localizing to microglial genes may contribute to Aβ and tau accumulation and microglial activation, likely starting from the preclinical (cognitively unimpaired) stage. These findings directly connect aggregate microglial AD genetic risk with Aβ and tau accumulation, and provide a genetic rational
ISSN:1552-5260
1552-5279
DOI:10.1002/alz.061819