Spinal dysraphia as an autosomal dominant defect in four families
Four families were selected randomly on the basis of the occurrence of spina bifida cystica and/or spina bifida occulta in one or more family members. Sixty‐three relatives were studied clinically and roentgenologically; their roentgenograms were evaluated blindly. Twenty‐eight were clinically and r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of medical genetics 1982-08, Vol.12 (4), p.457-464 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Four families were selected randomly on the basis of the occurrence of spina bifida cystica and/or spina bifida occulta in one or more family members. Sixty‐three relatives were studied clinically and roentgenologically; their roentgenograms were evaluated blindly. Twenty‐eight were clinically and roentgenologically normal; 35 were diagnosed as having spina bifida occulta (SBO), spina bifida cystica (SBC), vertebral anomalies, and/or external defects usually interpreted as evidence for SBO. Excluding one proband we found the frequency of SBO to be 19/51 (37%) and the frequency of all types of spinal/vertebral defects (excluding five probands) to be 30/58 (52%). The distribution of these defects in the four families was analyzed using likelihood methods corrected for random ascertainment.
The log likelihood values for sporadic, recessive, and dominant models were −26.69, −20.95, and −18.90, respectively, indicating a higher likelihood of autosomal dominant inheritance than sporadic occurrence or recessive inheritance. The penetrance probability in this dominant model, estimated by maximum likelihood, is 0.749 ± 0.100. Further examination of these data suggests that SBO and SBC represent different expressions of the same dominant gene in these kindreds. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-7299 1096-8628 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ajmg.1320120409 |