RE: MTBE misclassified

Dr. Mehlman's commentary on the decision not to list methyl‐tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) in the NTP 9th Report on Carcinogens correctly raises process questions, but also leads back to the public health fundamentals of motor fuel toxicity. I was a voter in the minority for listing MTBE, and also...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of industrial medicine 2001-05, Vol.39 (5), p.509-510
1. Verfasser: Mirer, Franklin E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Dr. Mehlman's commentary on the decision not to list methyl‐tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) in the NTP 9th Report on Carcinogens correctly raises process questions, but also leads back to the public health fundamentals of motor fuel toxicity. I was a voter in the minority for listing MTBE, and also a peer reviewer for the revised criteria for listing substances some years ago. Dr. Mehlman's commentary brings to light a prime example of "Houdini Risk Assessments", risk assessments which make the risk disappear and, therefore, allow industry to escape preventive measures.
ISSN:0271-3586
1097-0274
DOI:10.1002/ajim.1045