An Enhanced Johnson–Cook Model for Hot Compressed A356 Aluminum Alloy

The isothermal compression experiments with the strain rates of 0.01–10 s−1 and deformation temperature range of 300–420 °C are performed to investigate the hot deformation behavior of A356 aluminum alloy. Also, the complex deformation mechanisms are analyzed. It is found that, as the strain is grad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advanced engineering materials 2021-01, Vol.23 (1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Xiao-Min, Lin, Y. C., Hu, Hong-Wei, Luo, Shun-Cun, Zhou, Xiao-Jie, Huang, Yi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The isothermal compression experiments with the strain rates of 0.01–10 s−1 and deformation temperature range of 300–420 °C are performed to investigate the hot deformation behavior of A356 aluminum alloy. Also, the complex deformation mechanisms are analyzed. It is found that, as the strain is gradually increased, the flow stress first rises, and then the stable stress appears without a tangible peak. The microstructures exhibit large elongated grains, and only a few small new grains appear under most deformation conditions. It is because the dynamic recovery (DRV) is the dominant softening mechanism. Based on the measured data, both the original Johnson–Cook (O–JC) model and modified Johnson–Cook model (M–JC) are built for the tested aluminum alloy. However, there are different deviations between the experimental and the predicted true stresses by O–JC model and M–JC model. Considering the obvious DRV features, an enhanced Johnson–Cook (EH–JC) model is proposed by introducing the stress–dislocation relation. The accuracy of the EH–JC model is validated because the correlation coefficient between the experimental and predicted results is as high as 0.997, whereas the average absolute relative error is merely 2.84%. The hot compressive deformation behaviors of A356 aluminum alloy are studied. The main softening mechanism is dynamic recovery. Both the original Johnson–Cook model and modified Johnson–Cook model are built, but they cannot accurately describe the hot deformation behavior. Considering the obvious DRV feature, an enhanced Johnson–Cook model is proposed and validated.
ISSN:1438-1656
1527-2648
DOI:10.1002/adem.202000704