Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms

Importance Mammography screening currently relies on subjective human interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) advances could be used to increase mammography screening accuracy by reducing missed cancers and false positives. Objective To evaluate whether AI can overcome human mammography interpr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA network open 2020-03, Vol.3 (3), p.e200265-e200265, Article 200265
Hauptverfasser: Schaffter, Thomas, Buist, Diana S. M., Lee, Christoph, Nikulin, Yaroslav, Ribli, Dezso, Guan, Yuanfang, Lotter, William, Jie, Zequn, Du, Hao, Wang, Sijia, Feng, Jiashi, Feng, Mengling, Kim, Hyo-Eun, Albiol, Francisco, Albiol, Alberto, Morrell, Stephen, Wojna, Zbigniew, Ahsen, Mehmet Eren, Asif, Umar, Yepes, Antonio Jimeno, Yohanandan, Shivanthan, Rabinovici-Cohen, Simona, Yi, Darvin, Hoff, Bruce, Yu, Thomas, Neto, Elias Chaibub, Rubin, Daniel L., Lindholm, Peter, Margolies, Laurie R., McBride, Russell Bailey, Rothstein, Joseph H., Sieh, Weiva, Ben-Ari, Rami, Harrer, Stefan, Trister, Andrew, Friend, Stephen, Norman, Thea, Sahiner, Berkman, Strand, Fredrik, Guinney, Justin, Stolovitzky, Gustavo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Importance Mammography screening currently relies on subjective human interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) advances could be used to increase mammography screening accuracy by reducing missed cancers and false positives. Objective To evaluate whether AI can overcome human mammography interpretation limitations with a rigorous, unbiased evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Design, Setting, and Participants In this diagnostic accuracy study conducted between September 2016 and November 2017, an international, crowdsourced challenge was hosted to foster AI algorithm development focused on interpreting screening mammography. More than 1100 participants comprising 126 teams from 44 countries participated. Analysis began November 18, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measurements Algorithms used images alone (challenge 1) or combined images, previous examinations (if available), and clinical and demographic risk factor data (challenge 2) and output a score that translated to cancer yes/no within 12 months. Algorithm accuracy for breast cancer detection was evaluated using area under the curve and algorithm specificity compared with radiologists' specificity with radiologists' sensitivity set at 85.9% (United States) and 83.9% (Sweden). An ensemble method aggregating top-performing AI algorithms and radiologists' recall assessment was developed and evaluated. Results Overall, 144 & x202f;231 screening mammograms from 85 & x202f;580 US women (952 cancer positive
ISSN:2574-3805
2574-3805
DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0265