Inclusive Architecture, from Theory to Practice: Illustrated Through a Case Study of the Center for Cancer and Health in Copenhagen

Over the past decade, universal design has become a well-known term for most architects and designers in Scandinavia. The concept has been implemented politically, legally, and within construction through crucial documents and writings. Despite the apparent interest in the term, there remains a need to develop and discuss the concepts of universal design from an architectural perspective. How can we improve and develop solutions that account for different people's needs? How can we nuance, understand various user needs and perspectives, and then translate this understanding into concrete solutions that enhance architectural quality for all users of buildings? By examining the use of the term universal design, one can see that it has taken on slightly different meanings across various disciplines. Still, in all fields, it encompasses an approach to the design process that places the people who use and experience the solutions at the center. Understanding different people's experiences and uses of buildings is a strategy we believe leads to higher-quality solutions. However, a crucial prerequisite is to accept and understand that people can use and experience buildings and surroundings differently. Insight and knowledge about these conditions can form a framework for creative thinking and the development of new and better physical environments. The book "Inclusive Architecture" [8] focuses on a methodological approach that starts with people's experiences and use of buildings.