Ipilimumab and nivolumab combined with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A randomized phase 2b trial
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown minimal clinical activity in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ mBC). Doxorubicin and low- dose cyclophosphamide are reported to induce immune responses and counter regulatory T cells (Tregs). Here, we report the efficacy and sa...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown
minimal clinical activity in hormone receptor-positive
metastatic breast cancer (HR+
mBC). Doxorubicin and
low- dose cyclophosphamide are reported to induce
immune responses and counter regulatory T cells (Tregs).
Here, we report the efficacy and safety of combined
programmed cell death protein-1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-
associated protein 4 blockade concomitant with or after
immunomodulatory chemotherapy for HR + mBC.
Methods Patients with HR+
mBC starting first-/second-
line chemotherapy (chemo) were randomized 2:3 to
chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg/
m 2 every second week plus cyclophosphamide 50 mg by
mouth/day in every other 2-week cycle) with or without
concomitant ipilimumab (ipi; 1 mg/kg every sixth week)
and nivolumab (nivo; 240 mg every second week). Patients
in the chemo-only arm were offered cross-over to ipi/
nivo without chemotherapy. Co-primary endpoints were
safety in all patients starting therapy and progression-free
survival (PFS) in the per-protocol (PP) population, defined
as all patients evaluated for response and receiving at
least two treatment cycles. Secondary endpoints included
objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, Treg changes
during therapy and assessment of programmed death-
ligand 1 (PD-L1), mutational burden and immune gene
signatures as biomarkers.
Results Eighty-two patients were randomized and
received immune-chemo (N=49) or chemo-only (N=33),
16 patients continued to the ipi/nivo-only cross- over arm.
Median follow-up was 41.4 months. Serious adverse
events occurred in 63% in the immune-chemo arm, 39%
in the chemo-only arm and 31% in the cross- over-arm.
In the PP population (N=78) median PFS in the immune-
chemo arm was 5.1 months, compared with 3.6 months in
the chemo-only arm, with HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.51).
Clinical benefit rates were 55% (26/47) and 48% (15/31)
in the immune-chemo and chemo- only arms, respectively.
In the cross-over-arm (ipi/nivo-only), objective responses
were observed in 19% of patients (3/16) and clinical
benefit in 25% (4/16). Treg levels in blood decreased after
study chemotherapy. High-grade immune-related adverse
events were associated with prolonged PFS. PD-L1 status
and mutational burden were not associated with ipi/nivo
benefit, whereas a numerical PFS advantage was observed
for patients with a high Treg gene signature in tumor.
Conclusion The addition of ipi/nivo to chemotherapy increased
toxicity without i |
---|