How pupils’ playfulness creates possibilities for pleasure and learning in physical education
Background: Physical education has been described as too instrumental and uncritical, where a focus on utility has limited the value of pleasure in movement. Decades of previous research has addressed the need for changes where embodied experiences and learning are emphasized [Kirk, David, and Richa...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Physical education has been described as too instrumental
and uncritical, where a focus on utility has limited the value of pleasure
in movement. Decades of previous research has addressed the need for
changes where embodied experiences and learning are emphasized
[Kirk, David, and Richard Tinning. 1994. “Embodied Self-Identity,
Healthy Lifestyles and School Physical Education.” Sociology of Health
and Illness 16 (5): 600–625; Kirk, David. 2010. Physical Education
Futures. London: Routledge; Wrench, Alison, and Robyne Garrett. 2015.
“PE: It’s Just Me: Physically Active and Healthy Teacher Bodies.”
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (QSE) 28 (1):
72–91; Wright, Jan. 2000. “Bodies, Meanings and Movement: A
Comparison of the Language of a Physical Education Lesson and a
Feldenkrais Movement Class.” Sport, Education & Society 5 (1): 35–49].
Accordingly, we align with the ongoing call for a ‘corporeal turn’
[Smith, Stephen J. 2007. “The First Rush of Movement: A
Phenomenological Preface to Movement Education.” Phenomenology &
Practice 1 (1): 47–75, 66] in physical education, towards a more
holistic understanding of learning and experience as embodied and
emplaced [Pink, Sarah. 2011. “From Embodiment to Emplacement: Re-
Thinking Competing Bodies, Senses and Spatialities.” Sport, Education
and Society 16 (3):343–355.]. This turn may involve a curriculum where
pleasurable and meaningful movement experiences are educational
goals. Building on this, we ask whether a pedagogy that gives room
for playfulness may be a starting point for physical education being
perceived as more meaningful and pleasurable. Our theoretical
framework builds upon Wellard’s model of body-reflexive pleasure,
Hyland’s understanding of playfulness as a responsive openness and
Gibson’s theories of affordances.
Purpose: In this study we explore pupils’ embodied experiences in
physical education, using empirical findings from a sensory
ethnography. The research questions asked are ‘How do pupils’
playfulness create possibilities for pleasure in physical education? And
which opportunities for embodied learning are being offered through
playful and pleasurable experiences?’ Our aim is to inform and
develop pedagogies of embodiment by including playfulness as a
strategy for facilitating opportunities for pleasurable and meaningful
experiences that enable embodied learning.
Method: The empirical data is based on a sensory ethnographic
fieldwork conducted in a 10th |
---|