Low inter-rater reliability between nurses and researchers for the NRS-2002 screening tool for malnutrition in a hematological hospital ward
BACKGROUND & AIMSNRS-2002 is one of the recommended tools to screen hospitalized patients for malnutrition. NRS-2002 is considered as valid and reliable, but little is known about the inter-rater reliability between different groups of healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to test...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical nutrition ESPEN 2022-10, Vol.51, p.490-492 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND & AIMSNRS-2002 is one of the recommended tools to screen hospitalized patients for malnutrition. NRS-2002 is considered as valid and reliable, but little is known about the inter-rater reliability between different groups of healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to test the inter-rater reliability of the NRS-2002 tool between department nurses and researchers. METHODSInter-rater reliability was measured between the NRS-2002 scores given by department nurses and researchers, using data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) at a hematological department in a Norwegian hospital. RESULTSThe mean NRS-2002 score was significantly higher when using researchers' scores compared to the department nurses' scores. The total agreement between the two groups of raters was 59%, kappa = 0.27. CONCLUSIONThe inter-rater reliability of the NRS-2002 scores given by nurses and researchers was low. More research is needed to study if this is applicable also to other patient groups and in other wards. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2405-4577 2405-4577 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.06.107 |