Artificial Intelligence-based Segmentation of Residual Pancreatic Cancer in Resection Specimens Following Neoadjuvant Treatment (ISGPP-2): International Improvement and Validation Study

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become routine in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pathologists examine pancreatic cancer resection specimens to evaluate the effect of NAT. However, an automated scoring system to objectively quantify residual pancreatic cancer (RPC) is currently...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgical pathology 2024-09, Vol.48 (9), p.1108-1116
Hauptverfasser: Janssen, Boris V, Oteman, Bart, Ali, Mahsoem, Valkema, Pieter A, Adsay, Volkan, Basturk, Olca, Chatterjee, Deyali, Chou, Angela, Crobach, Stijn, Doukas, Michael, Drillenburg, Paul, Esposito, Irene, Gill, Anthony J, Hong, Seung-Mo, Jansen, Casper, Kliffen, Mike, Mittal, Anubhav, Samra, Jas, van Velthuysen, Marie-Louise F, Yavas, Aslihan, Kazemier, Geert, Verheij, Joanne, Steyerberg, Ewout, Besselink, Marc G, Wang, Huamin, Verbeke, Caroline, Fariña, Arantza, de Boer, Onno J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become routine in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pathologists examine pancreatic cancer resection specimens to evaluate the effect of NAT. However, an automated scoring system to objectively quantify residual pancreatic cancer (RPC) is currently lacking. Herein, we developed and validated the first automated segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC. Digitized histopathological tissue slides were included from resected pancreatic cancer specimens from 14 centers in 7 countries in Europe, North America, Australia, and Asia. Four different scanner types were used: Philips (56%), Hamamatsu (27%), 3DHistech (10%), and Leica (7%). Regions of interest were annotated and classified as cancer, non-neoplastic pancreatic ducts, and others. A U-Net model was trained to detect RPC. Validation consisted of by-scanner internal-external cross-validation. Overall, 528 unique hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides from 528 patients were included. In the individual Philips, Hamamatsu, 3DHistech, and Leica scanner cross-validations, mean F1 scores of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84), 0.80 (0.78-0.83), 0.76 (0.65-0.78), and 0.71 (0.65-0.78) were achieved, respectively. In the meta-analysis of the cross-validations, the mean F1 score was 0.78 (0.71-0.84). A final model was trained on the entire data set. This ISGPP model is the first segmentation model using artificial intelligence techniques to objectively quantify RPC following NAT. The internally-externally cross-validated model in this study demonstrated robust performance in detecting RPC in specimens. The ISGPP model, now made publically available, enables automated RPC segmentation and forms the basis for objective NAT response evaluation in pancreatic cancer.
ISSN:0147-5185
1532-0979
1532-0979
DOI:10.1097/PAS.0000000000002270