Norwegian radiologists’ expectations of artificial intelligence in mammographic screening – A cross-sectional survey
•Norwegian radiologists have positive expectations of AI in mammographic screening.•Expectance of increased sensitivity when adding AI in the interpretation procedure.•Reduced time spent on reading mammograms was reported as potential benefit.•Trust in AI-results was reported as a main challenge.•Di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2023-10, Vol.167, p.111061-111061, Article 111061 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Norwegian radiologists have positive expectations of AI in mammographic screening.•Expectance of increased sensitivity when adding AI in the interpretation procedure.•Reduced time spent on reading mammograms was reported as potential benefit.•Trust in AI-results was reported as a main challenge.•Discrepancies between AI and radiology interpretation was reported as a main challenge.
To explore Norwegian breast radiologists’ expectations of adding artificial intelligence (AI) in the interpretation procedure of screening mammograms.
All breast radiologists involved in interpretation of screening mammograms in BreastScreen Norway during 2021 and 2022 (n = 98) were invited to take part in this anonymous cross-sectional survey about use of AI in mammographic screening. The questionnaire included background information of the respondents, their expectations, considerations of biases, and ethical and social implications of implementing AI in screen reading. Data was collected digitally and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
The response rate was 61% (60/98), and 67% (40/60) of the respondents were women. Sixty percent (36/60) reported ≥10 years’ experience in screen reading, while 82% (49/60) reported no or limited experience with AI in health care. Eighty-two percent of the respondents were positive to explore AI in the interpretation procedure in mammographic screening. When used as decision support, 68% (41/60) expected AI to increase the radiologists’ sensitivity for cancer detection. As potential challenges, 55% (33/60) reported lack of trust in the AI system and 45% (27/60) reported discrepancy between radiologists and AI systems as possible challenges. The risk of automation bias was considered high among 47% (28/60). Reduced time spent reading mammograms was rated as a potential benefit by 70% (42/60).
The radiologists reported positive expectations of AI in the interpretation procedure of screening mammograms. Efforts to minimize the risk of automation bias and increase trust in the AI systems are important before and during future implementation of the tool. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0720-048X 1872-7727 1872-7727 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111061 |