Content analysis of systematic reviews on effectiveness of Tradition- al Chinese Medicine
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate evidence for the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in systematic reviews. METHODS: Chinese (TCM Periodical Literature Da- tabase, Chinese Biological Medicine database, Chi- nese Medical Current Contents, China Hospital Knowledge Database journal fulltext database,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | 中医杂志:英文版 2013 (2), p.156-163 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate evidence for the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in systematic reviews. METHODS: Chinese (TCM Periodical Literature Da- tabase, Chinese Biological Medicine database, Chi- nese Medical Current Contents, China Hospital Knowledge Database journal fulltext database, Vir- tual Machining and Inspection System, and Wan- fang) and English (Cochrane Database of Systemat- ic Reviews, PubMed and Embase) databases were searched. RESULTS: Three thousand, nine hundred and fif- ty-five articles were initially identified, 606 of which met the inclusion criteria, including 251 in English (83 from the Cochrane Database) and 355 in Chi- nese. The number of articles published each year in- creased between 1989 and 2009. Cardiocerebrovas- cular disease was the most studied target disease.Intervention measures included TCM preparations (177 articles), acupuncture (133 articles) and combi- nations of TCM and Western Medicine (38 articles). Control measures included positive medical (177 ar- ticles), basic treatment (100 articles), placebo (219 articles), and blank and mutual (107 articles). All ar- ticles included at least one reference; the greatest number was 268. Six of 10 articles with high quality references demonstrated curative effectsagainst target diseases including upper respiratory tract in- fection, dementia and depression. Interventions that were not recommended were tripterygium for rheumatoid arthritis and TCM syndrome differentia- tion for pediatric nocturia. In 10.4% of the studies, the authors concluded that the intervention had a curative effect. The assessors agreed with the au- thors' conclusions in 88.32% of cases, but rejected 8.94% (54 articles). CONCLUSION: 1) Training in systematic review methods, including topic selection, study design, methods and technology, should be improved. 2) Upper respiratory tract infection, dementia and de- pression may become the predominant diseases treated by TCM, and the corresponding interven- tions could be developed into practical applica- tions. 3) Use of non-recommended interventions should be controlled, and there should be more re- search on side effects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0255-2922 |