Two mechanical methods for thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaeeological pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomised study
Background Venous thromboembolism is known to be an important social and health care problem because of its high incidence among patients who undergo surgery. Studies on the mechanical prophylaxis of thromboembolism after gynaecological pelvic surgery are few. The aim of our study was to evaluate th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | 中华医学杂志:英文版 2012 (23), p.4259-4263 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4263 |
---|---|
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 4259 |
container_title | 中华医学杂志:英文版 |
container_volume | |
creator | GAO Jie ZHANG Zhen-yu LI Zhan LIU Chong-dong ZHAN Yu-xin QIAO Bao-li SANG Cui-qin GUO Shu-li WANG Shu-zhen JIANG Ying ZHAO Na |
description | Background Venous thromboembolism is known to be an important social and health care problem because of its high incidence among patients who undergo surgery. Studies on the mechanical prophylaxis of thromboembolism after gynaecological pelvic surgery are few. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaecological pelvic surgery using a combination of graduated compression stockings (GCS) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) or GCS alone. Methods The study was performed on 108 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received GCS before the operation and IPC during the operation (IPC+GCS group), The second group received GCS before the operation (GCS group). To analyze the effect of the preventive measures and the laboratory examination on the incidence of thrombosis and to compare the safety of these measures, the incidence of adverse reactions was assessed. Results The morbidity associated with DVT was 4.8% (5/104) in the IPC+GCS group and 12.5% (14/112) in the GCS group. There were significant statistical differences between the two groups. There were no adverse effects in either group. Conclusions The therapeutic combination of GCS and prevention in high-risk patients undergoing gynaecological group.(No. ChiCTR-PRC-10000935). IPC was more effective than GCS alone for thrombosis pelvic surgery, and there were no adverse effects in either |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>chongqing</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_chongqing_primary_43959434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>43959434</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>43959434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-chongqing_primary_439594343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi0tOBCEURYnRxPKzh-fcSsoqwDA2GhfQ8w5SrwADPITqVgZuxLW4J7dga1yAg5N7BvccsW4UfOyF5DfHrBsmKXuplDplZ7U-D8MoxK3s2PvmlSCicTp5o8NBV0dzhYUKrK5QfCI8EHyNkAtl14J-8xX0smIB25JGpED2N84Y9t5A3RWLpX19foD-iWpGs_o9XkPRaaboK85Q193cLtjJokPFy789Z1cP95u7x944SvbFJ7vNxUdd2pZPSig-8ek_n2_i4VMG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two mechanical methods for thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaeeological pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomised study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>GAO Jie ZHANG Zhen-yu LI Zhan LIU Chong-dong ZHAN Yu-xin QIAO Bao-li SANG Cui-qin GUO Shu-li WANG Shu-zhen JIANG Ying ZHAO Na</creator><creatorcontrib>GAO Jie ZHANG Zhen-yu LI Zhan LIU Chong-dong ZHAN Yu-xin QIAO Bao-li SANG Cui-qin GUO Shu-li WANG Shu-zhen JIANG Ying ZHAO Na</creatorcontrib><description>Background Venous thromboembolism is known to be an important social and health care problem because of its high incidence among patients who undergo surgery. Studies on the mechanical prophylaxis of thromboembolism after gynaecological pelvic surgery are few. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaecological pelvic surgery using a combination of graduated compression stockings (GCS) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) or GCS alone. Methods The study was performed on 108 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received GCS before the operation and IPC during the operation (IPC+GCS group), The second group received GCS before the operation (GCS group). To analyze the effect of the preventive measures and the laboratory examination on the incidence of thrombosis and to compare the safety of these measures, the incidence of adverse reactions was assessed. Results The morbidity associated with DVT was 4.8% (5/104) in the IPC+GCS group and 12.5% (14/112) in the GCS group. There were significant statistical differences between the two groups. There were no adverse effects in either group. Conclusions The therapeutic combination of GCS and prevention in high-risk patients undergoing gynaecological group.(No. ChiCTR-PRC-10000935). IPC was more effective than GCS alone for thrombosis pelvic surgery, and there were no adverse effects in either</description><identifier>ISSN: 0366-6999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2542-5641</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>GCS ; 手术 ; 机械方法 ; 栓塞 ; 盆腔 ; 随机分配 ; 静脉血栓 ; 预防效果</subject><ispartof>中华医学杂志:英文版, 2012 (23), p.4259-4263</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/85656X/85656X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GAO Jie ZHANG Zhen-yu LI Zhan LIU Chong-dong ZHAN Yu-xin QIAO Bao-li SANG Cui-qin GUO Shu-li WANG Shu-zhen JIANG Ying ZHAO Na</creatorcontrib><title>Two mechanical methods for thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaeeological pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomised study</title><title>中华医学杂志:英文版</title><addtitle>Chinese Medical Journal</addtitle><description>Background Venous thromboembolism is known to be an important social and health care problem because of its high incidence among patients who undergo surgery. Studies on the mechanical prophylaxis of thromboembolism after gynaecological pelvic surgery are few. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaecological pelvic surgery using a combination of graduated compression stockings (GCS) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) or GCS alone. Methods The study was performed on 108 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received GCS before the operation and IPC during the operation (IPC+GCS group), The second group received GCS before the operation (GCS group). To analyze the effect of the preventive measures and the laboratory examination on the incidence of thrombosis and to compare the safety of these measures, the incidence of adverse reactions was assessed. Results The morbidity associated with DVT was 4.8% (5/104) in the IPC+GCS group and 12.5% (14/112) in the GCS group. There were significant statistical differences between the two groups. There were no adverse effects in either group. Conclusions The therapeutic combination of GCS and prevention in high-risk patients undergoing gynaecological group.(No. ChiCTR-PRC-10000935). IPC was more effective than GCS alone for thrombosis pelvic surgery, and there were no adverse effects in either</description><subject>GCS</subject><subject>手术</subject><subject>机械方法</subject><subject>栓塞</subject><subject>盆腔</subject><subject>随机分配</subject><subject>静脉血栓</subject><subject>预防效果</subject><issn>0366-6999</issn><issn>2542-5641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi0tOBCEURYnRxPKzh-fcSsoqwDA2GhfQ8w5SrwADPITqVgZuxLW4J7dga1yAg5N7BvccsW4UfOyF5DfHrBsmKXuplDplZ7U-D8MoxK3s2PvmlSCicTp5o8NBV0dzhYUKrK5QfCI8EHyNkAtl14J-8xX0smIB25JGpED2N84Y9t5A3RWLpX19foD-iWpGs_o9XkPRaaboK85Q193cLtjJokPFy789Z1cP95u7x944SvbFJ7vNxUdd2pZPSig-8ek_n2_i4VMG</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>GAO Jie ZHANG Zhen-yu LI Zhan LIU Chong-dong ZHAN Yu-xin QIAO Bao-li SANG Cui-qin GUO Shu-li WANG Shu-zhen JIANG Ying ZHAO Na</creator><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Two mechanical methods for thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaeeological pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomised study</title><author>GAO Jie ZHANG Zhen-yu LI Zhan LIU Chong-dong ZHAN Yu-xin QIAO Bao-li SANG Cui-qin GUO Shu-li WANG Shu-zhen JIANG Ying ZHAO Na</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-chongqing_primary_439594343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>GCS</topic><topic>手术</topic><topic>机械方法</topic><topic>栓塞</topic><topic>盆腔</topic><topic>随机分配</topic><topic>静脉血栓</topic><topic>预防效果</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GAO Jie ZHANG Zhen-yu LI Zhan LIU Chong-dong ZHAN Yu-xin QIAO Bao-li SANG Cui-qin GUO Shu-li WANG Shu-zhen JIANG Ying ZHAO Na</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><jtitle>中华医学杂志:英文版</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GAO Jie ZHANG Zhen-yu LI Zhan LIU Chong-dong ZHAN Yu-xin QIAO Bao-li SANG Cui-qin GUO Shu-li WANG Shu-zhen JIANG Ying ZHAO Na</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two mechanical methods for thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaeeological pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomised study</atitle><jtitle>中华医学杂志:英文版</jtitle><addtitle>Chinese Medical Journal</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><issue>23</issue><spage>4259</spage><epage>4263</epage><pages>4259-4263</pages><issn>0366-6999</issn><eissn>2542-5641</eissn><abstract>Background Venous thromboembolism is known to be an important social and health care problem because of its high incidence among patients who undergo surgery. Studies on the mechanical prophylaxis of thromboembolism after gynaecological pelvic surgery are few. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaecological pelvic surgery using a combination of graduated compression stockings (GCS) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) or GCS alone. Methods The study was performed on 108 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received GCS before the operation and IPC during the operation (IPC+GCS group), The second group received GCS before the operation (GCS group). To analyze the effect of the preventive measures and the laboratory examination on the incidence of thrombosis and to compare the safety of these measures, the incidence of adverse reactions was assessed. Results The morbidity associated with DVT was 4.8% (5/104) in the IPC+GCS group and 12.5% (14/112) in the GCS group. There were significant statistical differences between the two groups. There were no adverse effects in either group. Conclusions The therapeutic combination of GCS and prevention in high-risk patients undergoing gynaecological group.(No. ChiCTR-PRC-10000935). IPC was more effective than GCS alone for thrombosis pelvic surgery, and there were no adverse effects in either</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0366-6999 |
ispartof | 中华医学杂志:英文版, 2012 (23), p.4259-4263 |
issn | 0366-6999 2542-5641 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_chongqing_primary_43959434 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | GCS 手术 机械方法 栓塞 盆腔 随机分配 静脉血栓 预防效果 |
title | Two mechanical methods for thromboembolism prophylaxis after gynaeeological pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomised study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T22%3A06%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-chongqing&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20mechanical%20methods%20for%20thromboembolism%20prophylaxis%20after%20gynaeeological%20pelvic%20surgery%EF%BC%9A%20a%20prospective,%20randomised%20study&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E5%8C%BB%E5%AD%A6%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88&rft.au=GAO%20Jie%20ZHANG%20Zhen-yu%20LI%20Zhan%20LIU%20Chong-dong%20ZHAN%20Yu-xin%20QIAO%20Bao-li%20SANG%20Cui-qin%20GUO%20Shu-li%20WANG%20Shu-zhen%20JIANG%20Ying%20ZHAO%20Na&rft.date=2012&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=4259&rft.epage=4263&rft.pages=4259-4263&rft.issn=0366-6999&rft.eissn=2542-5641&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cchongqing%3E43959434%3C/chongqing%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=43959434&rfr_iscdi=true |