Rješenje je – proširenje! Prilog debatama o budućnosti EU i procesa proširenja

The theory of EU integrations has neglected importance of one of the main processes within the EU – the enlargement. Although it is common to relate the issue of enlargement with the Central and East Europe, and nowadays with Western Balkans, the EU took many more rounds of enlargement over years. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka 2008 (3-4), p.139-152
1. Verfasser: Džananović Miraščija, Nedžma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:bos
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 139
container_title Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
container_volume
creator Džananović Miraščija, Nedžma
description The theory of EU integrations has neglected importance of one of the main processes within the EU – the enlargement. Although it is common to relate the issue of enlargement with the Central and East Europe, and nowadays with Western Balkans, the EU took many more rounds of enlargement over years. The two crucial aspects of European integration, deepening and enlarging, have been taking place simultaneously. EU has taken steps towards closer integration at the same time as it enlarged. The latest expansion that took place in 2007 drove EU very close to decision to put further rounds of enlargement on hold. The rhetoric which is full of “enlargement fatigue” and “absorption capacity” sends a clear message that EU feels like giving up its role in democratization, political stabilization, economic liberalization, peace-building and rule of law in Western Balkans and all other aspirants. Moreover, the 2007 enlargement round for the first time in the EU history was not accompanied by its further deepening. Enlargement process has been establishing and elaborating the applicants’ European dimension, on one side. On the other, it helped construct common EU self-understanding as a new and genuinely different form of collective political identity. Contrary to what is generally assumed about the Western Balkans enlargement, the challenges EU is facing in that particular region are not new or unknown. The findings of this paper argue it is more correct to interpret this round of enlargement as another (re)defining moment in the evolution of its self-understanding, yet more substantial than the Lisbon Treaty.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_77156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>77156</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>77156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_771563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0tDAx0DU0N7DgYOAtLs5MMjA2MwJCE0NOhpCgrNSjC1PzslIVgOhRw2SFgqL8owszi0BCigoBRZk5-ekKKalJiSWJuYkK-QpJpSmlR9rz8otLMhVcQxUyQeqTU4sTkfQl8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBmk31xBnD93k1NT8nPis_NKiPKB4vLm5oamZMX5ZAPoSPlM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rješenje je – proširenje! Prilog debatama o budućnosti EU i procesa proširenja</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Džananović Miraščija, Nedžma</creator><creatorcontrib>Džananović Miraščija, Nedžma</creatorcontrib><description>The theory of EU integrations has neglected importance of one of the main processes within the EU – the enlargement. Although it is common to relate the issue of enlargement with the Central and East Europe, and nowadays with Western Balkans, the EU took many more rounds of enlargement over years. The two crucial aspects of European integration, deepening and enlarging, have been taking place simultaneously. EU has taken steps towards closer integration at the same time as it enlarged. The latest expansion that took place in 2007 drove EU very close to decision to put further rounds of enlargement on hold. The rhetoric which is full of “enlargement fatigue” and “absorption capacity” sends a clear message that EU feels like giving up its role in democratization, political stabilization, economic liberalization, peace-building and rule of law in Western Balkans and all other aspirants. Moreover, the 2007 enlargement round for the first time in the EU history was not accompanied by its further deepening. Enlargement process has been establishing and elaborating the applicants’ European dimension, on one side. On the other, it helped construct common EU self-understanding as a new and genuinely different form of collective political identity. Contrary to what is generally assumed about the Western Balkans enlargement, the challenges EU is facing in that particular region are not new or unknown. The findings of this paper argue it is more correct to interpret this round of enlargement as another (re)defining moment in the evolution of its self-understanding, yet more substantial than the Lisbon Treaty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1840-1708</identifier><language>bos</language><publisher>Fakultet političkih nauka - Univerzitet u Sarajevu</publisher><subject>Politics / Political Sciences</subject><ispartof>Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 2008 (3-4), p.139-152</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Džananović Miraščija, Nedžma</creatorcontrib><title>Rješenje je – proširenje! Prilog debatama o budućnosti EU i procesa proširenja</title><title>Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka</title><addtitle>Yearbook of the Faculty of Political Sciences</addtitle><description>The theory of EU integrations has neglected importance of one of the main processes within the EU – the enlargement. Although it is common to relate the issue of enlargement with the Central and East Europe, and nowadays with Western Balkans, the EU took many more rounds of enlargement over years. The two crucial aspects of European integration, deepening and enlarging, have been taking place simultaneously. EU has taken steps towards closer integration at the same time as it enlarged. The latest expansion that took place in 2007 drove EU very close to decision to put further rounds of enlargement on hold. The rhetoric which is full of “enlargement fatigue” and “absorption capacity” sends a clear message that EU feels like giving up its role in democratization, political stabilization, economic liberalization, peace-building and rule of law in Western Balkans and all other aspirants. Moreover, the 2007 enlargement round for the first time in the EU history was not accompanied by its further deepening. Enlargement process has been establishing and elaborating the applicants’ European dimension, on one side. On the other, it helped construct common EU self-understanding as a new and genuinely different form of collective political identity. Contrary to what is generally assumed about the Western Balkans enlargement, the challenges EU is facing in that particular region are not new or unknown. The findings of this paper argue it is more correct to interpret this round of enlargement as another (re)defining moment in the evolution of its self-understanding, yet more substantial than the Lisbon Treaty.</description><subject>Politics / Political Sciences</subject><issn>1840-1708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0tDAx0DU0N7DgYOAtLs5MMjA2MwJCE0NOhpCgrNSjC1PzslIVgOhRw2SFgqL8owszi0BCigoBRZk5-ekKKalJiSWJuYkK-QpJpSmlR9rz8otLMhVcQxUyQeqTU4sTkfQl8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBmk31xBnD93k1NT8nPis_NKiPKB4vLm5oamZMX5ZAPoSPlM</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Džananović Miraščija, Nedžma</creator><general>Fakultet političkih nauka - Univerzitet u Sarajevu</general><general>Faculty of Political Sciences - University of Sarajevo</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Rješenje je – proširenje! Prilog debatama o budućnosti EU i procesa proširenja</title><author>Džananović Miraščija, Nedžma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_771563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>bos</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Politics / Political Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Džananović Miraščija, Nedžma</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Džananović Miraščija, Nedžma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rješenje je – proširenje! Prilog debatama o budućnosti EU i procesa proširenja</atitle><jtitle>Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka</jtitle><addtitle>Yearbook of the Faculty of Political Sciences</addtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><issue>3-4</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>139-152</pages><issn>1840-1708</issn><abstract>The theory of EU integrations has neglected importance of one of the main processes within the EU – the enlargement. Although it is common to relate the issue of enlargement with the Central and East Europe, and nowadays with Western Balkans, the EU took many more rounds of enlargement over years. The two crucial aspects of European integration, deepening and enlarging, have been taking place simultaneously. EU has taken steps towards closer integration at the same time as it enlarged. The latest expansion that took place in 2007 drove EU very close to decision to put further rounds of enlargement on hold. The rhetoric which is full of “enlargement fatigue” and “absorption capacity” sends a clear message that EU feels like giving up its role in democratization, political stabilization, economic liberalization, peace-building and rule of law in Western Balkans and all other aspirants. Moreover, the 2007 enlargement round for the first time in the EU history was not accompanied by its further deepening. Enlargement process has been establishing and elaborating the applicants’ European dimension, on one side. On the other, it helped construct common EU self-understanding as a new and genuinely different form of collective political identity. Contrary to what is generally assumed about the Western Balkans enlargement, the challenges EU is facing in that particular region are not new or unknown. The findings of this paper argue it is more correct to interpret this round of enlargement as another (re)defining moment in the evolution of its self-understanding, yet more substantial than the Lisbon Treaty.</abstract><pub>Fakultet političkih nauka - Univerzitet u Sarajevu</pub><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1840-1708
ispartof Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 2008 (3-4), p.139-152
issn 1840-1708
language bos
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_77156
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Politics / Political Sciences
title Rješenje je – proširenje! Prilog debatama o budućnosti EU i procesa proširenja
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A29%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rje%C5%A1enje%20je%20%E2%80%93%20pro%C5%A1irenje!%20Prilog%20debatama%20o%20budu%C4%87nosti%20EU%20i%20procesa%20pro%C5%A1irenja&rft.jtitle=Godi%C5%A1njak%20Fakulteta%20politi%C4%8Dkih%20nauka&rft.au=D%C5%BEananovi%C4%87%20Mira%C5%A1%C4%8Dija,%20Ned%C5%BEma&rft.date=2008&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=139-152&rft.issn=1840-1708&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E77156%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=77156&rfr_iscdi=true