Rješenje je – proširenje! Prilog debatama o budućnosti EU i procesa proširenja
The theory of EU integrations has neglected importance of one of the main processes within the EU – the enlargement. Although it is common to relate the issue of enlargement with the Central and East Europe, and nowadays with Western Balkans, the EU took many more rounds of enlargement over years. T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka 2008 (3-4), p.139-152 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | bos |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The theory of EU integrations has neglected importance of one of the main
processes within the EU – the enlargement. Although it is common to relate
the issue of enlargement with the Central and East Europe, and nowadays with
Western Balkans, the EU took many more rounds of enlargement over years. The
two crucial aspects of European integration, deepening and enlarging, have been
taking place simultaneously. EU has taken steps towards closer integration at
the same time as it enlarged. The latest expansion that took place in 2007 drove
EU very close to decision to put further rounds of enlargement on hold. The rhetoric which is full of “enlargement fatigue” and “absorption capacity” sends
a clear message that EU feels like giving up its role in democratization, political
stabilization, economic liberalization, peace-building and rule of law in Western
Balkans and all other aspirants. Moreover, the 2007 enlargement round for the
first time in the EU history was not accompanied by its further deepening. Enlargement
process has been establishing and elaborating the applicants’ European
dimension, on one side. On the other, it helped construct common EU self-understanding
as a new and genuinely different form of collective political identity.
Contrary to what is generally assumed about the Western Balkans enlargement,
the challenges EU is facing in that particular region are not new or unknown. The
findings of this paper argue it is more correct to interpret this round of enlargement
as another (re)defining moment in the evolution of its self-understanding,
yet more substantial than the Lisbon Treaty. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1840-1708 |