Confiscarea extinsă numai pentru fapte săvârșite, bunuri dobândite și cheltuieli efectuate după intrarea în vigoare a Legii nr. 63/2012. Neluarea în considerare a veniturilor declarate după formularea acuzației. Cheltuieli stabilite prin estimare

At first instance, under art. 1182 par. (1) lett. p) and par. (2) of the previous Criminal Code (1969), extended confiscation from defendant C.S. the sum of 47,229 lei, as well as the amount of 33,450 euros. The Supreme Court had no objection to the judgments of the first instance, concerning, among other things, the estimated costs, the failure to take into account the revenue declared after the accusation, the belief that the sums subject to the extended confiscation come from criminal activities the nature of the person for whom the defendant has been convicted, i.e. trafficking of influence. The only thing to correct is that the defendant made the following expense: the amount of 3,950 euros, the cost of a trip for tourism purposes in Singapore and Bali Island from 24 October to 4 November 2011. In the context of the very first instance explicitly states that, by Decision no. 356/2014, the Constitutional Court of Romania stated that the provisions of art. 1182 par. (2) lett. a) of the abovementioned code are constitutional insofar as extended confiscation does not apply to goods acquired before the entry into force of Law no. 63/2012 (which occurred on April 22, 2012), there is no legal reason to seize that amount. Therefore, the retrial of the case, pursuant to art. 1182 par. (1) lett. p) and par. (2) Criminal Code since 1969, the Supreme Court ordered extended confiscation from defendant C.S. the sum of 47,229 lei, as well as the amount of 29,500 euros.