Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 28 kwietnia 2016 r. (I KZP 24/15)
The author agrees with the thesis of the verdict according to which, “the legal protection that is due to a public official granted to a physician in Art. 44 of the Act of 5 December 1996 on the Professions of a Physician and a Dentist Physician and in Art. 5 of the Act of 8 September 2006 on Nation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studia Iuridica Lublinensia (Online) 2017, Vol.26 (2), p.177-185 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | pol |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The author agrees with the thesis of the verdict according to which, “the legal protection that is due to a public official granted to a physician in Art. 44 of the Act of 5 December 1996 on the Professions of a Physician and a Dentist Physician and in Art. 5 of the Act of 8 September 2006 on National Medical Emergency Service does not cover situations other than providing shortterm assistance (i.e. providing first aid and performing emergency medical procedures) or medical assistance where any delay would result in exposing to danger of loss of life, grievous bodily harm or health disorder, and in other urgent cases”. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1731-6375 2449-8289 |