MLMS – ENABLING SCORM COMPATIBLE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Starting with ‘iFever’, during the last five years, mobile devices became the next big step in the ITC industry with the next five anticipating their becoming the “de facto” Internet access devices. eLearning must migrate as well, in order to maintain its main purpose: delivering information and emp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | eLearning and Software for Education 2012, Vol.8 (2), p.80-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Starting with ‘iFever’, during the last five years, mobile devices became the next big step in
the ITC industry with the next five anticipating their becoming the “de facto” Internet access devices.
eLearning must migrate as well, in order to maintain its main purpose: delivering information and
empowering knowledge acquisition. The mobile enabled Learning Management Systems must be a
hybrid one, capable of delivering content and record user progress in various contexts both classical
and mobile. Although the main focus in present times has been on how content should be designed for
mobile delivery, the same question should be asked for Learning Management Systems, as well, how
they should be designed to enable delivery of such mobile content. This paper analyses what are the
main challenges for designing such an mLMS are, and how they can obey both the quite old
requirements like the SCORM standard as well as the mobile devices characteristics such as
discontinuous access to the LMS (due to Internet access limitations) within a session or between
sessions, content faceting (adding mobile support for existing content), feedback from and
synchronisation of multiple access points (mobile or desktop) in achieving learning goals and objectives
by using cloud enabled architectures. We are addressing issues concerning content compatibility
validation for mobile devices, aggregation of mobile content with analogous content, enhancement of
existing content and how an mLMS should be storing asynchronous submission of learner progress data
as well as synchronicity between desktop clients and mobile clients. The last concern involves analysing
device delivery mechanisms, custom LMS clients for mobiles and capabilities that could be implemented
by such clients in order to overcome the inherent limitations of a browser-only web application delivery
system for mobile devices. Last but not least we address issues concerning accessibility of content, a
feature often overlooked by mobile content in general. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2066-026X 2066-8821 |