Barbarus (ja Semper) ning „modernim ahvisugu” XX sajandi esimese poole haritlasvasakpoolsuse estetistlikust aluspõhjast

This article explores how the works and activities of close intellectual companions Johannes Barbarus and Johannes Semper reconcile their alignment with a decadent and aestheticist artistic stance with their leftist views (leading to collaboration with Soviet power and the writing of propagandistic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Keel ja kirjandus 2024, Vol.LXVII (1-2), p.144-157
1. Verfasser: Pilv , Aare
Format: Artikel
Sprache:est
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article explores how the works and activities of close intellectual companions Johannes Barbarus and Johannes Semper reconcile their alignment with a decadent and aestheticist artistic stance with their leftist views (leading to collaboration with Soviet power and the writing of propagandistic poetry). The discussion begins with Barbarus’ poem “Journey” (Teekond), where the individualistic poet contrasts with the “modern apes”, representing progressivist and calculating bourgeois modernity. The article delves into the internal ambivalence expressed in Barbarus’ poetry, revealing simultaneous attraction and repulsion towards large revolutionary crowds; the poet likely perceives the masses primarily as a source of aesthetic sublimity akin to other natural elements. The use of Verhaeren’s name in this poem and elsewhere in the works of Barbarus and Semper is then examined. The second half of the article broadens the discussion, exploring the shared grounds of decadence/aestheticism and utopian avant-gardism – an aesthetic resistance to modern progressivist society that ultimately leads to ideological transformation through the actualization of utopia and the internal collapse of initial aspirations. Barbarus and Semper’s midcentury choices can also be seen as artists’ aesthetic decisions, the fulfilment (but also failure) of aesthetic aspirations originating from decadence. The article concludes with the suggestion that aestheticism rooted in the attitudes of decadence may still be a viable approach to overcome the miseries of modernity – not by merging into revolutionary utopianism, but by assuming the form of “dark ecology”.
ISSN:0131-1441