Градитељско дело, контекст, значење: приступи проучавању на примеру архитектуре Моравске Србије
The art of the last period of the Serb Medieval state, known as the Art of Morava Serbia, was and remains one of the most complex questions of the Serbian Medieval art. So far, it was evaluated in a very wide range — from being labeled the most original and only truly national art style of Medieval...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Istorijski časopis 2008 (57), p.93-106 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | srp |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The art of the last period of the Serb Medieval state, known as the Art of
Morava Serbia, was and remains one of the most complex questions of the Serbian
Medieval art.
So far, it was evaluated in a very wide range — from being labeled the most
original and only truly national art style of Medieval Serbia, to being reduced to mere
eclecticism, art of local importance, lacking full development and major changes. Such
conclusions were especially present when evaluating the architecture of the Morava
Serbia. A more balanced perspective is rendered more difficult by the fact that the wider
frame, where it undoubtedly belongs as an important segment — the Late Byzantine
architecture — represents another very complex issue.
Scholarly research in the Morava Serbia architecture began in the early days of
the establishment of art history in Serbia, during the last three decades of the 19th
century. Knowledge presented at the time was only within the limits of basic facts about
the past, and the look of the churches known at the time. Among the first synthetic
works on Medieval Serbia architecture by European researchers, especially influential
was Gabriel Millet's L'ancien art serbe. Les églises (Paris, 1919). This French scholar
established a model of describing Serb Medieval architecture chronologically,
territorially, and in wholes stylistically homogenous, which he labeled “schools,” whichhistorically followed one after the other, in an evolutionary sequence, from simpler to
more complex architectural organisms.
A change in perception occurred in mid-1960s, in works of the two leading
researchers at the time, Vojislav Korać and Vojislav J. Đurić. Finally, after several
decades of study of Morava Serbia architecture and sculpture, there is a first synthetic
work, by Vladislav Ristić (Moravska arhitektura, Kruševac, 1996). However, this book,
although very important, still represents only modernized form of the traditional
typological classification, established by Gabriel Millet. Thus, it confirms the degree in
which even contemporary science remains captive to old concepts and models of
perceiving Morava Serbia architecture. Fortunately, some more recent monographs
display use of qualitatively different methodological takes on its study (I. Stevović,
Kalenić. Bogorodična crkva u arhitekturi poznovizantijskog sveta, Belgrade, 2006).
By analyzing these works, one could note that the efforts of scholars for the
most part went within the framework determined by stu |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0350-0802 |