"Batory" Matejki w Paryżu w roku 1874
The article focuses on the exhibiting of Jan Matejko’s painting Báthory at the Salon in Paris in 1874. It was already the fourth time Matejko had exhibited in Paris since his debut in 1865, and the second time (after the Salon of 1870), where he entered “hors concours”, having already been awarded m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Kronika zamkowa 2016, Vol.3 (3), p.311-334 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | pol |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The article focuses on the exhibiting of Jan Matejko’s painting Báthory at the Salon in Paris
in 1874. It was already the fourth time Matejko had exhibited in Paris since his debut in 1865,
and the second time (after the Salon of 1870), where he entered “hors concours”, having
already been awarded medals. In 1873 the presentation of eleven of his paintings at the
Vienna World Exhibition proved to be a huge success. Báthory was also well-received in
Paris, although it was Matejko’s last indisputable success there—in the following years,
despite obtaining the medal of honour at the World Exhibition of 1878, he began to
receive mainly negative reviews. This article outlines the context of the 1874 Salon and
highlights the political issues relating to history paintings. The assessment of Matejko’s painting
is based on the reviews of approximately twenty-five authors. Báthory received a great deal
of acclaim for being one of the best historical paintings at the Salon at a time when this
genre was undergoing change and visitors were less and less interested in it. Matejko was most
frequently compared to Puvis de Chavannes, whose decorative compositions were synthetic
and symbolist in nature. Due to the tendency towards historical reconstruction’ Matejko was
classified as an ‘archaeologist’ alongside Alma-Tadema and J.-P. Laurens. However, on the
whole, the general public tended to prefer the historical genre paintings of the type produced
by Gérôme, and the subject matter of Báthory was not received positively: the French were
either indifferent to it, or they did not understand it. Lengthy articles of several reviewers (e.g. G.
Lafenestre, L. Gonse, P. de Saint-Victor) did little to help. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0239-4898 |