Ku vzťahu prirodzenosti a milosti: extrincizmus vs. integralizmus

Ku vzťahu prirodzenosti a milosti: extrincizmus vs. integralizmus

The question of the nature and the ultimate goal of human being has always been the subject of philosophical and theological reflection. From the point of view of Christian theology, man’s goal is an eternal contemplation of God, but to achieve this goal requires God’s grace, which man can in no way...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studia Aloisiana : ročenka Teologickej fakulty Trnavskej univerzity 2021, Vol.12 (4), p.33-55
1. Verfasser: Spišiaková, Mária
Format: Artikel
Sprache:slo
Schlagworte:
Christian Theology and Religion
Metaphysics
Ontology
Philosophy of Religion
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 55
container_issue 4
container_start_page 33
container_title Studia Aloisiana : ročenka Teologickej fakulty Trnavskej univerzity
container_volume 12
creator Spišiaková, Mária
description The question of the nature and the ultimate goal of human being has always been the subject of philosophical and theological reflection. From the point of view of Christian theology, man’s goal is an eternal contemplation of God, but to achieve this goal requires God’s grace, which man can in no way earn. From this paradox arose the so-called two-goal theory (duplex ordo), according to which the goal of man in the so-called “pure nature”, that means without God’s grace, differs from the goal of man with God’s grace. Theologians such as K. Rahner and H. de Lubac criticized this and they offered instead an integral solution, providing a unified view of human nature, grace and goal of humanity.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1047098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1047098</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1047098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_10470983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjMx0TUzM4hgYeA0NDa20DUwNbDgYOAtLs4yMDAwMjC2NDU152Rw8i5VKKs6ujQxo1ShoCizKD-lKjUvv7gkUyFRITczB8SyUkitKCnKzEvOrMotLVYoK9ZTyMwrSU0vSswBi_AwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgZZN9cQZw_d5NTU_Jz4rPzSojygeLyhgYm5gaWFMSF5ACLsOSs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ku vzťahu prirodzenosti a milosti: extrincizmus vs. integralizmus</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Spišiaková, Mária</creator><creatorcontrib>Spišiaková, Mária</creatorcontrib><description>The question of the nature and the ultimate goal of human being has always been the subject of philosophical and theological reflection. From the point of view of Christian theology, man’s goal is an eternal contemplation of God, but to achieve this goal requires God’s grace, which man can in no way earn. From this paradox arose the so-called two-goal theory (duplex ordo), according to which the goal of man in the so-called “pure nature”, that means without God’s grace, differs from the goal of man with God’s grace. Theologians such as K. Rahner and H. de Lubac criticized this and they offered instead an integral solution, providing a unified view of human nature, grace and goal of humanity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1338-0508</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2644-660X</identifier><language>slo</language><publisher>Teologická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity</publisher><subject>Christian Theology and Religion ; Metaphysics ; Ontology ; Philosophy of Religion</subject><ispartof>Studia Aloisiana : ročenka Teologickej fakulty Trnavskej univerzity, 2021, Vol.12 (4), p.33-55</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2021_67988.png</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spišiaková, Mária</creatorcontrib><title>Ku vzťahu prirodzenosti a milosti: extrincizmus vs. integralizmus</title><title>Studia Aloisiana : ročenka Teologickej fakulty Trnavskej univerzity</title><addtitle>Studia Aloisiana</addtitle><description>The question of the nature and the ultimate goal of human being has always been the subject of philosophical and theological reflection. From the point of view of Christian theology, man’s goal is an eternal contemplation of God, but to achieve this goal requires God’s grace, which man can in no way earn. From this paradox arose the so-called two-goal theory (duplex ordo), according to which the goal of man in the so-called “pure nature”, that means without God’s grace, differs from the goal of man with God’s grace. Theologians such as K. Rahner and H. de Lubac criticized this and they offered instead an integral solution, providing a unified view of human nature, grace and goal of humanity.</description><subject>Christian Theology and Religion</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophy of Religion</subject><issn>1338-0508</issn><issn>2644-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjMx0TUzM4hgYeA0NDa20DUwNbDgYOAtLs4yMDAwMjC2NDU152Rw8i5VKKs6ujQxo1ShoCizKD-lKjUvv7gkUyFRITczB8SyUkitKCnKzEvOrMotLVYoK9ZTyMwrSU0vSswBi_AwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgZZN9cQZw_d5NTU_Jz4rPzSojygeLyhgYm5gaWFMSF5ACLsOSs</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Spišiaková, Mária</creator><general>Teologická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity</general><general>Faculty of Theology, Trnava University</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Ku vzťahu prirodzenosti a milosti: extrincizmus vs. integralizmus</title><author>Spišiaková, Mária</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_10470983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>slo</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Christian Theology and Religion</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophy of Religion</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spišiaková, Mária</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Studia Aloisiana : ročenka Teologickej fakulty Trnavskej univerzity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spišiaková, Mária</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ku vzťahu prirodzenosti a milosti: extrincizmus vs. integralizmus</atitle><jtitle>Studia Aloisiana : ročenka Teologickej fakulty Trnavskej univerzity</jtitle><addtitle>Studia Aloisiana</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>33-55</pages><issn>1338-0508</issn><eissn>2644-660X</eissn><abstract>The question of the nature and the ultimate goal of human being has always been the subject of philosophical and theological reflection. From the point of view of Christian theology, man’s goal is an eternal contemplation of God, but to achieve this goal requires God’s grace, which man can in no way earn. From this paradox arose the so-called two-goal theory (duplex ordo), according to which the goal of man in the so-called “pure nature”, that means without God’s grace, differs from the goal of man with God’s grace. Theologians such as K. Rahner and H. de Lubac criticized this and they offered instead an integral solution, providing a unified view of human nature, grace and goal of humanity.</abstract><pub>Teologická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity</pub><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1338-0508
ispartof Studia Aloisiana : ročenka Teologickej fakulty Trnavskej univerzity, 2021, Vol.12 (4), p.33-55
issn 1338-0508
2644-660X
language slo
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_1047098
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Christian Theology and Religion
Metaphysics
Ontology
Philosophy of Religion
title Ku vzťahu prirodzenosti a milosti: extrincizmus vs. integralizmus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ku%20vz%C5%A5ahu%20prirodzenosti%20a%20milosti:%20extrincizmus%20vs.%20integralizmus&rft.jtitle=Studia%20Aloisiana%20:%20ro%C4%8Denka%20Teologickej%20fakulty%20Trnavskej%20univerzity&rft.au=Spi%C5%A1iakov%C3%A1,%20M%C3%A1ria&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=33-55&rft.issn=1338-0508&rft.eissn=2644-660X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E1047098%3C/ceeol%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1047098&rfr_iscdi=true