Ku vzťahu prirodzenosti a milosti: extrincizmus vs. integralizmus
The question of the nature and the ultimate goal of human being has always been the subject of philosophical and theological reflection. From the point of view of Christian theology, man’s goal is an eternal contemplation of God, but to achieve this goal requires God’s grace, which man can in no way...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studia Aloisiana : ročenka Teologickej fakulty Trnavskej univerzity 2021, Vol.12 (4), p.33-55 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | slo |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The question of the nature and the ultimate goal of human being has always been the subject of philosophical and theological reflection. From the point of view of Christian theology, man’s goal is an eternal contemplation of God, but to achieve this goal requires God’s grace, which man can in no way earn. From this paradox arose the so-called two-goal theory (duplex ordo), according to which the goal of man in the so-called “pure nature”, that means without God’s grace, differs from the goal of man with God’s grace. Theologians such as K. Rahner and H. de Lubac criticized this and they offered instead an integral solution, providing a unified view of human nature, grace and goal of humanity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1338-0508 2644-660X |