Explicitly Said or Only Implied?

There are two main approaches in Islamic legal theory to the classification of a meaning as explicit or implicit. The two approaches-i.e. the Šāfiʿite and the Ḥanafite-differ with regard to their underlying hermeneutic paradigms. It is sometimes assumed that the "standard" Šāfiʿite approac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oriens 2018 (1-2), p.186-221
1. Verfasser: Kalbarczyk, Nora
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There are two main approaches in Islamic legal theory to the classification of a meaning as explicit or implicit. The two approaches-i.e. the Šāfiʿite and the Ḥanafite-differ with regard to their underlying hermeneutic paradigms. It is sometimes assumed that the "standard" Šāfiʿite approach corresponds to that of Āmidī (d. 631/1233). However, as this paper argues, there were two other authors who had a major impact on the evolution of the Šāfiʿite approach: the post-Avicennian polymath and Šāfiʿī jurist Faḫr ad-dīn ar-Rāzī (d. 606/1210); and the Mālikite jurist Ibn al-Ḥāǧib (d. 646/1249) who creates his own classification-on the basis of both Āmidī's approach and the Ḥanafite paradigm. Aḍud ad-dīn al-Īǧī (d. 756/1355) eventually modified Ibn al-Ḥāǧib's classification using Rāzī's framework-and this is the version which is nowadays referred to as the Šāfiʿite approach.
ISSN:0078-6527
1877-8372
DOI:10.1163/18778372-04601006