NEDOCS vs subjective evaluation, ¿Is the health personnel of the emergency department aware of its overcrowding?
Introduction: An emergency department (ED) is considered to be "overcrowded" when the number of patients exceeds its treatment capacity and it does not have the conditions to meet the needs of the next patient to be treated. This study evaluates overcrowding in the emergency department of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Colombia médica (Cali, Colombia) Colombia), 2018-09, Vol.48 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction: An emergency department (ED) is considered to be
"overcrowded" when the number of patients exceeds its treatment
capacity and it does not have the conditions to meet the needs of the
next patient to be treated. This study evaluates overcrowding in the
emergency department of a hospital in Colombia. Objective: To compare
the objective NEDOCS scale with a subjective evaluation by ED health
staff in order to evaluate the differences between the two. Methods:
The NEDOCS scale was applied and a subjective overcrowding survey was
administered to the medical staff and the charge nurse on duty 6 times
per day (6:00 a.m., 9:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. and
9:00 p.m.) for three consecutive weeks. The results were evaluated with
a correlation analysis and measurement of agreement. Results: A median
NEDOCS score of 137 was obtained for the total data. There was a
moderately positive correlation between the NEDOCS and the subjective
scales, with a rho of 0.58 (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0120-8322 |