Effect of target controlled propofol infusion versus intermittent boluses during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
Background: Propofol is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve deep sedation to facilitate oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Target controlled infusion (TCI) can be employed for this purpose. Methods: 176 adults were randomly allocated into two groups of 88 patients. Control group: Received an i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | African health sciences 2020-02, Vol.19 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Propofol is administered as intermittent boluses to achieve
deep sedation to facilitate oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Target
controlled infusion (TCI) can be employed for this purpose. Methods:
176 adults were randomly allocated into two groups of 88 patients.
Control group: Received an initial bolus of propofol 1mg/kg, with
repeat boluses of 0.25mg/kg. Intervention group: Received an initial
target effect-site concentration of 4mcg/ml, followed by maintenance
target effect-site concentration of 2.5mcg/ml, titrated by 0.5mcg/ml
from baseline infusion rate as needed. Oxygen saturation, blood
pressure and heart rate were evaluated immediately before administering
the sedative and at 2.50, 5.00, 7.50 and 10.00 minutes. Oxygen
desaturation below 90% in both study groups was recorded. Sedation
starting time, stopping time, waking up time and overall duration of
time to recovery of participants in each study arm was recorded.
Results: More hypoxic episodes were observed in the intermittent bolus
group with statistically significant association between control and
the incidence of hypoxia: Chi square test, p=0.037. There were more
hypotensive episodes in the TCI group but not achieving statistical
significance: Chi square test for association X2(1) = 0.962,
p=0.327.The time to recovery between the two groups was comparable,
with 18.84 ± 10.76 minutes in the bolus group and 19.72 ±
9.27 minutes in the TCI group; no statistically significant difference
was shown: Student's t-test, p=0.0564. Conclusion: TCI of
propofol was associated with fewer episodes of hypoxia compared to
intermittent bolus administration. Similar hemodynamic profiles and
comparable time to recovery were demonstrated by these two sedation
techniques. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1680-6905 |