Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Maternal and Newborn Health
Maternal and newborn health (MNH) is a high priority for global health and is included among the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, the slow decline in maternal and newborn mortality jeopardizes achievements of the targets of MDGs. According to UNICEF, 60 million women give birth outside...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of health, population and nutrition population and nutrition, 2014-05, Vol.31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Maternal and newborn health (MNH) is a high priority for global health
and is included among the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However,
the slow decline in maternal and newborn mortality jeopardizes
achievements of the targets of MDGs. According to UNICEF, 60 million
women give birth outside of health facilities, and family planning
needs are satisfied for only 50%. Further, skilled birth attendance and
the use of antenatal care are most inequitably distributed in maternal
and newborn health interventions in low- and middle-income countries.
Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been shown to increase
health service utilization among the poorest but little is written on
the effects of such programmes on maternal and newborn health. We
carried out a systematic review of studies on CCT that report maternal
and newborn health outcomes, including studies from 8 countries. The
CCT programmes have increased antenatal visits, skilled attendance at
birth, delivery at a health facility, and tetanus toxoid vaccination
for mothers and reduced the incidence of low birthweight. The
programmes have not had a significant impact on fertility while the
impact on maternal and newborn mortality has not been welldocumented
thus far. Given these positive effects, we make the case for further
investment in CCT programmes for maternal and newborn health, noting
gaps in knowledge and providing recommendations for better design and
evaluation of such programmes. We recommend more rigorous impact
evaluations that document impact pathways and take factors, such as
cost-effectiveness, into account. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1606-0997 |