Disparities in the analysis of morphological disparity: Analysis of morphological disparity

Analyses of morphological disparity have been used to characterize and investigate the evolution of variation in the anatomy, function and ecology of organisms since the 1980s. While a diversity of methods have been employed, it is unclear whether they provide equivalent insights. Here, we review th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biology Letters 2020-07, Vol.16 (7), p.1-8, Article 20200199
Hauptverfasser: Guillerme, Thomas, Cooper, Natalie, Brusatte, Stephen L., Davis, Katie E., Jackson, Andrew L., Gerber, Sylvain, Goswami, Anjali, Healy, Kevin, Hopkins, Melanie J., Jones, Marc E.H., Lloyd, Graeme T., O'Reilly, Joseph E., Pate, Abi, Puttick, Mark N., Rayfield, Emily J., Saupe, Erin E., Sherratt, Emma, Slater, Graham J., Weisbecker, Vera, Thomas, Gavin H., Donoghue, Philip C.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Analyses of morphological disparity have been used to characterize and investigate the evolution of variation in the anatomy, function and ecology of organisms since the 1980s. While a diversity of methods have been employed, it is unclear whether they provide equivalent insights. Here, we review the most commonly used approaches for characterizing and analysing morphological disparity, all of which have associated limitations that, if ignored, can lead to misinterpretation. We propose best practice guidelines for disparity analyses, while noting that there can be no 'one-size-fits-all' approach. The available tools should always be used in the context of a specific biological question that will determine data and method selection at every stage of the analysis.
ISSN:1744-9561
1744-957X
1744-957X
DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2020.0199