The uncertainty in $\alpha_{s}(M_Z^2)$ determined from hadronic tau decay measurements
Nucl.Phys. B535 (1998) 19-40 We show that QCD Minkowski observables such as the $e^{+}e^{-}$ R-ratio and the hadronic tau decay $R_{\tau}$ are completely determined by the effective charge (EC) beta-function, $\rho(x)$, corresponding to the Euclidean QCD vacuum polarization Adler D-function, togethe...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Nucl.Phys. B535 (1998) 19-40 We show that QCD Minkowski observables such as the $e^{+}e^{-}$ R-ratio and
the hadronic tau decay $R_{\tau}$ are completely determined by the effective
charge (EC) beta-function, $\rho(x)$, corresponding to the Euclidean QCD vacuum
polarization Adler D-function, together with the next-to-leading order (NLO)
perturbative coefficient of D. An efficient numerical algorithm is given for
evaluating R, $R_{\tau}$ from a weighted contour integration of
$D(se^{i\theta})$ around a circle in the complex squared energy s-plane, with
$\rho(x)$ used to evolve in s around the contour. The EC beta-function can be
truncated at next-to-NLO (NNLO) using the known exact perturbative calculation
or the uncalculated N^3 LO and higher terms can be approximated by the portion
containing the highest power of b, the first QCD beta-function coefficient. The
difference between the R, $R_{\tau}$ constructed using the NNLO and "leading-b"
resummed versions of $\rho(x)$ provides an estimate of the uncertainty due to
the uncalculated higher order corrections. Simple numerical parametrizations
are given to facilitate these fits. For $R_{\tau}$ we estimate an uncertainty
$\delta\alpha_{s}(m_{\tau}^{2})\simeq0.01$, corresponding to
$\delta\alpha_{s}(M_{Z}^{2})\simeq0.002$. This encouragingly small uncertainty
is much less than rather pessimistic estimates by other authors based on
analogous all-orders resummations, which we demonstrate to be extremely
dependent on the chosen renormalization scheme, and hence misleading. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9705314 |