Physics-Informed Neuro-Evolution (PINE): A Survey and Prospects
Deep learning models trained on finite data lack a complete understanding of the physical world. On the other hand, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are infused with such knowledge through the incorporation of mathematically expressible laws of nature into their training loss function. By co...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Deep learning models trained on finite data lack a complete understanding of
the physical world. On the other hand, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs)
are infused with such knowledge through the incorporation of mathematically
expressible laws of nature into their training loss function. By complying with
physical laws, PINNs provide advantages over purely data-driven models in
limited-data regimes. This feature has propelled them to the forefront of
scientific machine learning, a domain characterized by scarce and costly data.
However, the vision of accurate physics-informed learning comes with
significant challenges. This review examines PINNs for the first time in terms
of model optimization and generalization, shedding light on the need for new
algorithmic advances to overcome issues pertaining to the training speed,
precision, and generalizability of today's PINN models. Of particular interest
are the gradient-free methods of neuroevolution for optimizing the uniquely
complex loss landscapes arising in PINN training. Methods synergizing gradient
descent and neuroevolution for discovering bespoke neural architectures and
balancing multiple conflicting terms in physics-informed learning objectives
are positioned as important avenues for future research. Yet another exciting
track is to cast neuroevolution as a meta-learner of generalizable PINN models. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2501.06572 |