A Bayesian Mixture Model Approach to Examining Neighborhood Social Determinants of Health Disparities in Endometrial Cancer Care in Massachusetts
Many studies have examined social determinants of health (SDoH) factors independently, overlooking their interconnected and intersectional nature. Our study takes a multifactorial approach to construct a neighborhood level measure of SDoH and explores how neighborhood residency impacts care received...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Many studies have examined social determinants of health (SDoH) factors
independently, overlooking their interconnected and intersectional nature. Our
study takes a multifactorial approach to construct a neighborhood level measure
of SDoH and explores how neighborhood residency impacts care received by
endometrial cancer patients in Massachusetts. We used a Bayesian multivariate
Bernoulli mixture model to create and characterize neighborhood SDoH (NSDoH)
profiles using the 2015-2019 American Community Survey at the census tract
level (n=1478), incorporating 18 variables across four domains: housing
conditions and resources, economic security, educational attainment, and social
and community context. We linked these profiles to Massachusetts Cancer
Registry data to estimate the odds of receiving optimal care for endometrial
cancer using Bayesian multivariate logistic regression. The model identified
eight NSDoH profiles. Profiles 1 and 2 accounted for 27% and 25% of census
tracts, respectively. Profile 1 featured neighborhoods with high homeownership,
above median incomes, and high education, while Profile 2 showed higher
probabilities of limited English proficiency, renters, lower education, and
working class jobs. After adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical
characteristics, we found no statistically significant association between
NSDoH profiles and receipt of optimal care. However, compared to patients in
NSDoH Profile 1, those in Profile 2 had lower odds of receiving optimal care,
OR = 0.77, 95% CI (0.56, 1.07). Our results demonstrate the interconnected and
multidimensional nature of NSDoH, underscoring the importance of modeling them
accordingly. This study also highlights the need for targeted interventions at
the neighborhood level to address underlying drivers of health disparities,
ensure equitable healthcare delivery, and foster better outcomes for all
patients. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2412.07134 |